2017•London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)Open access

What would voters be asked in a second EU referendum – and would they get it?

Alan Renwick

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

If – and it’s a big if – the government were to call a second EU referendum, what question would it ask? And would it be able to deliver the answer? In this extract from a new UCL European Institute working paper, Alan Renwick examines the likelihood, terms and outcome of any ‘second round’ vote.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If – and it’s a big if – the government were to call a second EU referendum, what question would it ask? And would it be able to deliver the answer? In this extract from a new UCL European Institute working paper, Alan Renwick examines the likelihood, terms and outcome of any ‘second round’ vote.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If – and it’s a big if – the government were to call a second EU referendum, what question would it ask? And would it be able to deliver the answer? In this extract from a new UCL European Institute working paper, Alan Renwick examines the likelihood, terms and outcome of any ‘second round’ vote.

Key concepts: Referendum, Government (linguistics), Political science, Ask price, Outcome (game theory), Public administration, Law, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What would voters be asked in a second EU referendum – and would they get it? — Research Paper | ScholarLens