2017Innovation in AgingOpen access

FUNCTIONAL DETERIORATION IN A GERIATRIC UNIT—HOW OFTEN DOES THIS HAPPEN?

Klaus Häger, Mary‐Lynn Brecht, O. Krause

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Most patients in a geriatric unit show an improvement of their functional abilities. But unfortunately this is not always true. Additionally due to changing financial resources the treatment results may have deteriorated over the past years. Methods: In the Center for Medicine in the Elderly in Hannover, an in-patient geriatric clinic in Germany 756 patients in 2004 and 2527 in the years 2008 to 2009 were analyzed. The measure for the activities of daily living (ADL) was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Moreover data from 1602 patients from 2014 were included, but here the Barthel-Index (BI) was used as ADL measure. Improvement resp. deterioration was defined as more or less than 0 points on the ADL scale between admission and discharge. Results: As shown by the FIM 5.2–6.0% of the patients deteriorated, 3.0–6.2% remained unchanged and 88.9–90.9% improved. As judged by the BI 6.2% deteriorated, 12.6% remained unchanged and 81.2% improved. Conclusion: Over ten years and with two instruments to measure activities of daily living, deterioration was only seen in about 5–6 % of the patients. About 95% remained unchanged or improved in their independence. In a usual care setting the percentage of elderly patients, who show declining ADL abilities may be much higher (e.g. Sager et al., 1996).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Most patients in a geriatric unit show an improvement of their functional abilities. But unfortunately this is not always true. Additionally due to changing financial resources the treatment results may have deteriorated over the past years. Methods: In the Center for Medicine in the Elderly in Hannover, an in-patient geriatric clinic in Germany 756 patients in 2004 and 2527 in the years 2008 to 2009 were analyzed. The measure for the activities of daily living (ADL) was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Moreover data from 1602 patients from 2014 were included, but here the Barthel-Index (BI) was used as ADL measure. Improvement resp. deterioration was defined as more or less than 0 points on the ADL scale between admission and discharge. Results: As shown by the FIM 5.2–6.0% of the patients deteriorated, 3.0–6.2% remained unchanged and 88.9–90.9% improved. As judged by the BI 6.2% deteriorated, 12.6% remained unchanged and 81.2% improved. Conclusion: Over ten years and with two instruments to measure activities of daily living, deterioration was only seen in about 5–6 % of the patients. About 95% remained unchanged or improved in their independence. In a usual care setting the percentage of elderly patients, who show declining ADL abilities may be much higher (e.g. Sager et al., 1996).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Most patients in a geriatric unit show an improvement of their functional abilities. But unfortunately this is not always true. Additionally due to changing financial resources the treatment results may have deteriorated over the past years. Methods: In the Center for Medicine in the Elderly in Hannover, an in-patient geriatric clinic in Germany 756 patients in 2004 and 2527 in the years 2008 to 2009 were analyzed. The measure for the activities of daily living (ADL) was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Moreover data from 1602 patients from 2014 were included, but here the Barthel-Index (BI) was used as ADL measure. Improvement resp. deterioration was defined as more or less than 0 points on the ADL scale between admission and discharge. Results: As shown by the FIM 5.2–6.0% of the patients deteriorated, 3.0–6.2% remained unchanged and 88.9–90.9% improved. As judged by the BI 6.2% deteriorated, 12.6% remained unchanged and 81.2% improved. Conclusion: Over ten years and with two instruments to measure activities of daily living, deterioration was only seen in about 5–6 % of the patients. About 95% remained unchanged or improved in their independence. In a usual care setting the percentage of elderly patients, who show declining ADL abilities may be much higher (e.g. Sager et al., 1996).

Key concepts: Activities of daily living, Barthel index, Functional Independence Measure, Medicine, Gerontology, Physical therapy, Independence (probability theory), Geriatrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FUNCTIONAL DETERIORATION IN A GERIATRIC UNIT—HOW OFTEN DOES THIS HAPPEN? — Research Paper | ScholarLens