1991•Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeRequires access

Peer Rejection is a Stubborn Thing: Increasing Peer Acceptance of Rejected Students with Learning Disabilities

Sharon R. Vaughn, Ruth McIntosh, Joan Spencer-Rowe

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

The efficacy of a contextualist training model for increasing the peer acceptance of peer rejected learning disabled students is evaluated. Ten peer rejected students, 7 male and 3 female in grades three through six, who were learning disabled were selected to participate in the 20 week intervention. Results indicate that significant increases in positive nominations occurred for males across pre and post measures and maintained at a 6 month follow-up measure. Five of the 10 subjects received classifications other than rejected at the postintervention measure. The components of the model are presented as well as results of subject interviews, reciprocal nominations, and peer pairing ratings. Discussion focuses on the characteristics of students whose peer acceptance is likely to increase with this model, as well as suggestions for increasing the model's effectiveness for future intervention research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy of a contextualist training model for increasing the peer acceptance of peer rejected learning disabled students is evaluated. Ten peer rejected students, 7 male and 3 female in grades three through six, who were learning disabled were selected to participate in the 20 week intervention. Results indicate that significant increases in positive nominations occurred for males across pre and post measures and maintained at a 6 month follow-up measure. Five of the 10 subjects received classifications other than rejected at the postintervention measure. The components of the model are presented as well as results of subject interviews, reciprocal nominations, and peer pairing ratings. Discussion focuses on the characteristics of students whose peer acceptance is likely to increase with this model, as well as suggestions for increasing the model's effectiveness for future intervention research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy of a contextualist training model for increasing the peer acceptance of peer rejected learning disabled students is evaluated. Ten peer rejected students, 7 male and 3 female in grades three through six, who were learning disabled were selected to participate in the 20 week intervention. Results indicate that significant increases in positive nominations occurred for males across pre and post measures and maintained at a 6 month follow-up measure. Five of the 10 subjects received classifications other than rejected at the postintervention measure. The components of the model are presented as well as results of subject interviews, reciprocal nominations, and peer pairing ratings. Discussion focuses on the characteristics of students whose peer acceptance is likely to increase with this model, as well as suggestions for increasing the model's effectiveness for future intervention research.

Key concepts: Learning disability, Peer acceptance, Psychology, Peer feedback, Social acceptance, Peer review, Developmental psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peer Rejection is a Stubborn Thing: Increasing Peer Acceptance of Rejected Students with Learning Disabilities — Research Paper | ScholarLens