2005Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyOpen access

Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in children

Denis Knijnik

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

AIM: To verify whether our results with endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children with nasolacrimal duct obstruction allow us to consider this technique a valid treatment alternative for children. STUDY DESIGN: clinical with transversal cohort. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty-seven endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomies were performed in children 2 to 12 years of age for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Previous probings in all patients were unsuccessful. The technique employed uncinectomy and a small lacrimal sac opening. Follow-up time was 3 months. RESULTS: Twenty-one surgeries (77,8%) were successful. The only complication was silicone prolapse in one case. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy as an acceptable and safe method for treating children with nasolacrimal duct obstructions that are resistant to probings.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To verify whether our results with endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children with nasolacrimal duct obstruction allow us to consider this technique a valid treatment alternative for children. STUDY DESIGN: clinical with transversal cohort. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty-seven endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomies were performed in children 2 to 12 years of age for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Previous probings in all patients were unsuccessful. The technique employed uncinectomy and a small lacrimal sac opening. Follow-up time was 3 months. RESULTS: Twenty-one surgeries (77,8%) were successful. The only complication was silicone prolapse in one case. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy as an acceptable and safe method for treating children with nasolacrimal duct obstructions that are resistant to probings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To verify whether our results with endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children with nasolacrimal duct obstruction allow us to consider this technique a valid treatment alternative for children. STUDY DESIGN: clinical with transversal cohort. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty-seven endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomies were performed in children 2 to 12 years of age for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Previous probings in all patients were unsuccessful. The technique employed uncinectomy and a small lacrimal sac opening. Follow-up time was 3 months. RESULTS: Twenty-one surgeries (77,8%) were successful. The only complication was silicone prolapse in one case. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy as an acceptable and safe method for treating children with nasolacrimal duct obstructions that are resistant to probings.

Key concepts: Dacryocystorhinostomy, Medicine, Nasolacrimal duct obstruction, Surgery, Nasolacrimal duct, Lacrimal sac, Complication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in children — Research Paper | ScholarLens