2017NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)Open access

Humanitarian Intervention: Preventing Or Prolonging Human Rights Violations

Ashley Melanie Gerow

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis was written to redefine successful humanitarian intervention under my own criteria. By analyzing the course of action of two notable humanitarian intervention campaigns, Kosovo and Libya, I argue that both were humanitarian failures and did not prevent a further humanitarian crisis. My conclusion of failure in regards to intervention in Kosovo contradicts popular literature on the intervention, and I highlight the intervention in Libya as being the cause of the current humanitarian crisis in the region. My critiques and criteria present an alternative way of examining military campaigns in the name of humanitarian interventionand I propose relying on civilian organizations to conduct humanitarian aid.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis was written to redefine successful humanitarian intervention under my own criteria. By analyzing the course of action of two notable humanitarian intervention campaigns, Kosovo and Libya, I argue that both were humanitarian failures and did not prevent a further humanitarian crisis. My conclusion of failure in regards to intervention in Kosovo contradicts popular literature on the intervention, and I highlight the intervention in Libya as being the cause of the current humanitarian crisis in the region. My critiques and criteria present an alternative way of examining military campaigns in the name of humanitarian interventionand I propose relying on civilian organizations to conduct humanitarian aid.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis was written to redefine successful humanitarian intervention under my own criteria. By analyzing the course of action of two notable humanitarian intervention campaigns, Kosovo and Libya, I argue that both were humanitarian failures and did not prevent a further humanitarian crisis. My conclusion of failure in regards to intervention in Kosovo contradicts popular literature on the intervention, and I highlight the intervention in Libya as being the cause of the current humanitarian crisis in the region. My critiques and criteria present an alternative way of examining military campaigns in the name of humanitarian interventionand I propose relying on civilian organizations to conduct humanitarian aid.

Key concepts: Humanitarian intervention, Humanitarian aid, Intervention (counseling), Humanitarian crisis, Political science, Human rights, Action (physics), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Humanitarian Intervention: Preventing Or Prolonging Human Rights Violations — Research Paper | ScholarLens