2004•社会学研究Requires access

文化社会学发展之争辩:概念、关系及思考

周怡

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article traces the development of cultural sociology by reviewing two scholarly debates: one is the conceptual definitions on culture, and the other is about the relationship between culture and structure. The author makes two contributions to these debates. The first is to classify various scholarly definitions of culture into four schools, namely, subjective culture, structural culture, dramaturgic culture, and institutional culture. The author draws on conceptual distinctions among these schools and argues that their interrelationships and interdependence imply the underlying mechanism whereby society and culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture and structure: macro-structural culturalism, structural cuhuralism, and culturalism. The author argues that culture retains its relative autonmy in society, and that cultural autonomy depends on social structure, human action, particular cultural domains, and cuhure-relevant structural fields.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article traces the development of cultural sociology by reviewing two scholarly debates: one is the conceptual definitions on culture, and the other is about the relationship between culture and structure. The author makes two contributions to these debates. The first is to classify various scholarly definitions of culture into four schools, namely, subjective culture, structural culture, dramaturgic culture, and institutional culture. The author draws on conceptual distinctions among these schools and argues that their interrelationships and interdependence imply the underlying mechanism whereby society and culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture and structure: macro-structural culturalism, structural cuhuralism, and culturalism. The author argues that culture retains its relative autonmy in society, and that cultural autonomy depends on social structure, human action, particular cultural domains, and cuhure-relevant structural fields.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article traces the development of cultural sociology by reviewing two scholarly debates: one is the conceptual definitions on culture, and the other is about the relationship between culture and structure. The author makes two contributions to these debates. The first is to classify various scholarly definitions of culture into four schools, namely, subjective culture, structural culture, dramaturgic culture, and institutional culture. The author draws on conceptual distinctions among these schools and argues that their interrelationships and interdependence imply the underlying mechanism whereby society and culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture and structure: macro-structural culturalism, structural cuhuralism, and culturalism. The author argues that culture retains its relative autonmy in society, and that cultural autonomy depends on social structure, human action, particular cultural domains, and cuhure-relevant structural fields.

Key concepts: Culturalism, Sociology, Epistemology, Sociology of culture, Social science, Action (physics), Vernacular culture, Politics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
文化社会学发展之争辩:概念、关系及思考 — Research Paper | ScholarLens