文化社会学发展之争辩:概念、关系及思考
周怡
Abstract
周怡
Abstract
This article traces the development of cultural sociology by reviewing two scholarly debates: one is the conceptual definitions on culture, and the other is about the relationship between culture and structure. The author makes two contributions to these debates. The first is to classify various scholarly definitions of culture into four schools, namely, subjective culture, structural culture, dramaturgic culture, and institutional culture. The author draws on conceptual distinctions among these schools and argues that their interrelationships and interdependence imply the underlying mechanism whereby society and culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture and structure: macro-structural culturalism, structural cuhuralism, and culturalism. The author argues that culture retains its relative autonmy in society, and that cultural autonomy depends on social structure, human action, particular cultural domains, and cuhure-relevant structural fields.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article traces the development of cultural sociology by reviewing two scholarly debates: one is the conceptual definitions on culture, and the other is about the relationship between culture and structure. The author makes two contributions to these debates. The first is to classify various scholarly definitions of culture into four schools, namely, subjective culture, structural culture, dramaturgic culture, and institutional culture. The author draws on conceptual distinctions among these schools and argues that their interrelationships and interdependence imply the underlying mechanism whereby society and culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture survive and develop from one generation to the next. The second is to offer a focused analysis of three sociological stands on the relationship between culture and structure: macro-structural culturalism, structural cuhuralism, and culturalism. The author argues that culture retains its relative autonmy in society, and that cultural autonomy depends on social structure, human action, particular cultural domains, and cuhure-relevant structural fields.
Key concepts: Culturalism, Sociology, Epistemology, Sociology of culture, Social science, Action (physics), Vernacular culture, Politics