2017•Current Protocols in Cell BiologyRequires access

Microcontact Peeling: A Cell Micropatterning Technique for Circumventing Direct Adsorption of Proteins to Hydrophobic PDMS

Sho YOKOYAMA, Tsubasa S. Matsui, Shinji Deguchi

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Microcontact printing (μCPr) is one of the most popular techniques used for cell micropatterning. In conventional μCPr, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp with microfeatures is used to adsorb extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins onto the featured surface and transfer them onto particular areas of a cell culture substrate. However, some types of functional proteins other than ECM have been reported to denature upon direct adsorption to hydrophobic PDMS. Here we describe a detailed protocol of an alternative technique--microcontact peeling (μCPe)--that allows for cell micropatterning while circumventing the step of adsorbing proteins to bare PDMS. This technique employs microfeatured materials with a relatively high surface energy such as copper, instead of using a microfeatured PDMS stamp, to peel off a cell-adhesive layer present on the surface of substrates. Consequently, cell-nonadhesive substrates are exposed at the specific surface that undergoes the physical contact with the microfeatured material. Thus, although μCPe and μCPr are apparently similar, the former does not comprise a process of transferring biomolecules through hydrophobic PDMS. © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Microcontact printing (μCPr) is one of the most popular techniques used for cell micropatterning. In conventional μCPr, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp with microfeatures is used to adsorb extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins onto the featured surface and transfer them onto particular areas of a cell culture substrate. However, some types of functional proteins other than ECM have been reported to denature upon direct adsorption to hydrophobic PDMS. Here we describe a detailed protocol of an alternative technique--microcontact peeling (μCPe)--that allows for cell micropatterning while circumventing the step of adsorbing proteins to bare PDMS. This technique employs microfeatured materials with a relatively high surface energy such as copper, instead of using a microfeatured PDMS stamp, to peel off a cell-adhesive layer present on the surface of substrates. Consequently, cell-nonadhesive substrates are exposed at the specific surface that undergoes the physical contact with the microfeatured material. Thus, although μCPe and μCPr are apparently similar, the former does not comprise a process of transferring biomolecules through hydrophobic PDMS. © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Microcontact printing (μCPr) is one of the most popular techniques used for cell micropatterning. In conventional μCPr, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp with microfeatures is used to adsorb extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins onto the featured surface and transfer them onto particular areas of a cell culture substrate. However, some types of functional proteins other than ECM have been reported to denature upon direct adsorption to hydrophobic PDMS. Here we describe a detailed protocol of an alternative technique--microcontact peeling (μCPe)--that allows for cell micropatterning while circumventing the step of adsorbing proteins to bare PDMS. This technique employs microfeatured materials with a relatively high surface energy such as copper, instead of using a microfeatured PDMS stamp, to peel off a cell-adhesive layer present on the surface of substrates. Consequently, cell-nonadhesive substrates are exposed at the specific surface that undergoes the physical contact with the microfeatured material. Thus, although μCPe and μCPr are apparently similar, the former does not comprise a process of transferring biomolecules through hydrophobic PDMS. © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Key concepts: Micropatterning, Microcontact printing, Adsorption, Protein adsorption, Materials science, Nanotechnology, Chemistry, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microcontact Peeling: A Cell Micropatterning Technique for Circumventing Direct Adsorption of Proteins to Hydrophobic PDMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens