2008Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)Open access

A survey on preparatory english 1 undergraduates perceptual learning style preferences and their instructors teaching styles

Fei Fei Huong

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the perceptual learning style preferences of undergraduates in Preparatory English I course in Semester I, Session 2007/2008 \nand their instructors' teaching styles. The objectives of the study are to investigate the undergraduates' learning styles and their instructors' teaching styles, as well \nas the relationship between the teaching and learning styles. Six types of learning/teaching styles were being investigated in this study, namely visual, tactile, auditory, kinesthetic, group and individual styles. 541 undergraduates' perceptual learning styles preference in terms of gender, races, and streams of study, and 24 instructors' teaching styles were investigated and the data were collected through questionnaires. The survey results showed that auditory learning style was the undergraduates' major learning styles. The statistical tests revealed that the undergraduates' preference on the learning styles was not influenced by their gender and streams of study. However, there was a significant difference in undergraduates' preference on tactile, auditory, kinesthetic and group learning styles based on races. The findings of the study revealed that kinesthetic and group learning styles were highly preferred by the instructors. Therefore, it \nsuggested that there was no significant relationship between the teaching styles and learning styles. The issue of mismatch was found in the classrooms. The \nfindings may imply that there is a need for the instructors and the undergraduates themselves to be more aware on the existence of differences in learning in order to achieve successful learning.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aims to investigate the perceptual learning style preferences of undergraduates in Preparatory English I course in Semester I, Session 2007/2008 \nand their instructors' teaching styles. The objectives of the study are to investigate the undergraduates' learning styles and their instructors' teaching styles, as well \nas the relationship between the teaching and learning styles. Six types of learning/teaching styles were being investigated in this study, namely visual, tactile, auditory, kinesthetic, group and individual styles. 541 undergraduates' perceptual learning styles preference in terms of gender, races, and streams of study, and 24 instructors' teaching styles were investigated and the data were collected through questionnaires. The survey results showed that auditory learning style was the undergraduates' major learning styles. The statistical tests revealed that the undergraduates' preference on the learning styles was not influenced by their gender and streams of study. However, there was a significant difference in undergraduates' preference on tactile, auditory, kinesthetic and group learning styles based on races. The findings of the study revealed that kinesthetic and group learning styles were highly preferred by the instructors. Therefore, it \nsuggested that there was no significant relationship between the teaching styles and learning styles. The issue of mismatch was found in the classrooms. The \nfindings may imply that there is a need for the instructors and the undergraduates themselves to be more aware on the existence of differences in learning in order to achieve successful learning.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aims to investigate the perceptual learning style preferences of undergraduates in Preparatory English I course in Semester I, Session 2007/2008 \nand their instructors' teaching styles. The objectives of the study are to investigate the undergraduates' learning styles and their instructors' teaching styles, as well \nas the relationship between the teaching and learning styles. Six types of learning/teaching styles were being investigated in this study, namely visual, tactile, auditory, kinesthetic, group and individual styles. 541 undergraduates' perceptual learning styles preference in terms of gender, races, and streams of study, and 24 instructors' teaching styles were investigated and the data were collected through questionnaires. The survey results showed that auditory learning style was the undergraduates' major learning styles. The statistical tests revealed that the undergraduates' preference on the learning styles was not influenced by their gender and streams of study. However, there was a significant difference in undergraduates' preference on tactile, auditory, kinesthetic and group learning styles based on races. The findings of the study revealed that kinesthetic and group learning styles were highly preferred by the instructors. Therefore, it \nsuggested that there was no significant relationship between the teaching styles and learning styles. The issue of mismatch was found in the classrooms. The \nfindings may imply that there is a need for the instructors and the undergraduates themselves to be more aware on the existence of differences in learning in order to achieve successful learning.

Key concepts: Kinesthetic learning, Learning styles, Preference, Psychology, Auditory learning, Perception, Style (visual arts), Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A survey on preparatory english 1 undergraduates perceptual learning style preferences and their instructors teaching styles — Research Paper | ScholarLens