2017•International Journal of Gynecological CancerRequires access

Difference in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters Between Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma and Uterine Serous Adenocarcinoma

Shifeng Tian, Ailian Liu, Wen Zhu, Ye Li, Lihua Chen, Anliang Chen, Jiageng Shen, Qingwei Song, Qiang Wei

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Effective diffusion coefficient, Diffusion MRI, Medicine, Fractional anisotropy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Receiver operating characteristic, Nuclear medicine, Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

Difference in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters Between Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma and Uterine Serous Adenocarcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens