2013viXraRequires access

How Newton Could Have Developed His Law of Gravitation.

Henok Tadesse

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The main idea in this paper is that physicists should have either explored the universe to discover a ‘solar system’ in which Newton’s law of gravitation applied exactly or should have explained the discrepancy between the implication of the simple Newton’s law of gravitation (circular orbits) and actual observation (non circular or ‘elliptic’) orbits, with sound logical consistency and validity. Discrepancies between a theory and actual observation should never be tolerated or given ad hoc explanations and carried forward. The discrepancy between Newton’s law of gravitation and actual observation turned out to be of fundamental importance as presented in my previous paper: “ ‘Elliptic’ Orbits and Mercury Perihelion Advance as Evidence for Absolute Motion ”

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The main idea in this paper is that physicists should have either explored the universe to discover a ‘solar system’ in which Newton’s law of gravitation applied exactly or should have explained the discrepancy between the implication of the simple Newton’s law of gravitation (circular orbits) and actual observation (non circular or ‘elliptic’) orbits, with sound logical consistency and validity. Discrepancies between a theory and actual observation should never be tolerated or given ad hoc explanations and carried forward. The discrepancy between Newton’s law of gravitation and actual observation turned out to be of fundamental importance as presented in my previous paper: “ ‘Elliptic’ Orbits and Mercury Perihelion Advance as Evidence for Absolute Motion ”

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The main idea in this paper is that physicists should have either explored the universe to discover a ‘solar system’ in which Newton’s law of gravitation applied exactly or should have explained the discrepancy between the implication of the simple Newton’s law of gravitation (circular orbits) and actual observation (non circular or ‘elliptic’) orbits, with sound logical consistency and validity. Discrepancies between a theory and actual observation should never be tolerated or given ad hoc explanations and carried forward. The discrepancy between Newton’s law of gravitation and actual observation turned out to be of fundamental importance as presented in my previous paper: “ ‘Elliptic’ Orbits and Mercury Perihelion Advance as Evidence for Absolute Motion ”

Key concepts: Newton's law of universal gravitation, Gravitation, Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism, Newton's laws of motion, Scalar theories of gravitation, Theoretical physics, Physics, Classical mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Newton Could Have Developed His Law of Gravitation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens