2016Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

The Role of Organization Structure in the Development of Dynamic Capabilities

Sebastian Fourné, Félix Arndt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the nature of dynamic capabilities, and use a fine-grained measurement to test how centralization, routinization, and formalization relate to the underlying learning components of dynamic capabilities. We find that the effects of organization structure are broadly similar for almost all components of dynamic capabilities, and that only a few show a different pattern. Centralization and routinization are negatively related to dynamic capabilities, formalization is shown to have a significantly positive effect. We provide insights into the role that organization structure plays in explaining variation among the learning components of dynamic capabilities. This has implications for the nature of dynamic capabilities as well as for the debate within the dynamic capabilities view on routine versus deliberate learning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, we investigate the nature of dynamic capabilities, and use a fine-grained measurement to test how centralization, routinization, and formalization relate to the underlying learning components of dynamic capabilities. We find that the effects of organization structure are broadly similar for almost all components of dynamic capabilities, and that only a few show a different pattern. Centralization and routinization are negatively related to dynamic capabilities, formalization is shown to have a significantly positive effect. We provide insights into the role that organization structure plays in explaining variation among the learning components of dynamic capabilities. This has implications for the nature of dynamic capabilities as well as for the debate within the dynamic capabilities view on routine versus deliberate learning.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, we investigate the nature of dynamic capabilities, and use a fine-grained measurement to test how centralization, routinization, and formalization relate to the underlying learning components of dynamic capabilities. We find that the effects of organization structure are broadly similar for almost all components of dynamic capabilities, and that only a few show a different pattern. Centralization and routinization are negatively related to dynamic capabilities, formalization is shown to have a significantly positive effect. We provide insights into the role that organization structure plays in explaining variation among the learning components of dynamic capabilities. This has implications for the nature of dynamic capabilities as well as for the debate within the dynamic capabilities view on routine versus deliberate learning.

Key concepts: Dynamic capabilities, Computer science, Variation (astronomy), Knowledge management, Physics, Astrophysics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Organization Structure in the Development of Dynamic Capabilities — Research Paper | ScholarLens