2017Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)Requires access

Calculation Methods for Steel Joints: Comparative Study of European Design Regulations and Partial Finite Element Analyses

Hugo van Egeraat

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Traditionally, steel joints are calculated by the calculation rules described in the Eurocode 3: NEN-EN 1993-1-8. Effective lengths are important parameters to determine the different resistances of the components in the steel joint. Finite Element Analyses (FEA) are becoming increasingly important in engineering, including in construction industry. Specialised software is developed to determine the stresses and corresponding strains in the plate elements of the joints by the Finite Element Method (FEM). This thesis reports on a comparative study of the traditional calculation method and a method which is using partial FEA for determining the resistance of joints. The approach, assumptions and principles used for these calculations are explained in this report. It will be investigated whether the same components of a joint are decisive for each method and if there are differences in joint resistances. If so, the magnitude of the difference will be determined as well. This is done for different simple shear joints (SSJ) and moment resisting joints (MRJ). For the last group, two joint configurations (Flush End Plate Joint and Extended End Plate Joint) are calculated manually, partially modelled with the FEM, and compared with the results of executed experiments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditionally, steel joints are calculated by the calculation rules described in the Eurocode 3: NEN-EN 1993-1-8. Effective lengths are important parameters to determine the different resistances of the components in the steel joint. Finite Element Analyses (FEA) are becoming increasingly important in engineering, including in construction industry. Specialised software is developed to determine the stresses and corresponding strains in the plate elements of the joints by the Finite Element Method (FEM). This thesis reports on a comparative study of the traditional calculation method and a method which is using partial FEA for determining the resistance of joints. The approach, assumptions and principles used for these calculations are explained in this report. It will be investigated whether the same components of a joint are decisive for each method and if there are differences in joint resistances. If so, the magnitude of the difference will be determined as well. This is done for different simple shear joints (SSJ) and moment resisting joints (MRJ). For the last group, two joint configurations (Flush End Plate Joint and Extended End Plate Joint) are calculated manually, partially modelled with the FEM, and compared with the results of executed experiments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditionally, steel joints are calculated by the calculation rules described in the Eurocode 3: NEN-EN 1993-1-8. Effective lengths are important parameters to determine the different resistances of the components in the steel joint. Finite Element Analyses (FEA) are becoming increasingly important in engineering, including in construction industry. Specialised software is developed to determine the stresses and corresponding strains in the plate elements of the joints by the Finite Element Method (FEM). This thesis reports on a comparative study of the traditional calculation method and a method which is using partial FEA for determining the resistance of joints. The approach, assumptions and principles used for these calculations are explained in this report. It will be investigated whether the same components of a joint are decisive for each method and if there are differences in joint resistances. If so, the magnitude of the difference will be determined as well. This is done for different simple shear joints (SSJ) and moment resisting joints (MRJ). For the last group, two joint configurations (Flush End Plate Joint and Extended End Plate Joint) are calculated manually, partially modelled with the FEM, and compared with the results of executed experiments.

Key concepts: Finite element method, Joint (building), Structural engineering, Eurocode, Moment (physics), Engineering, Simple (philosophy), Shear (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Calculation Methods for Steel Joints: Comparative Study of European Design Regulations and Partial Finite Element Analyses — Research Paper | ScholarLens