2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The State of the Criminology of Crimes of the State

L. Rothe Dawn, O. Friedrichs David

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

The first decade of the 21 st century is an especially appropriate time and venue for addressing the state of the criminology of crimes of the state. The interrelationship of a criminology of crimes of the state with cognate areas of criminological inquiry is delineated. Jeffrey Ian Ross&s; book, The Dynamics of Political Crime (2003), surveyed the state of a criminology of crimes of the state, with attention to oppositional political crimes, state crimes, political corruption, illegal domestic surveillance, human rights violations, state violence, and state-corporate crime. Most criminologists involved with the study of crimes of the state have principally been associated with some strain of conflict, radical, or critical criminology. Beyond the disputes fixated on standards used, and definitional issues of crimes of the state, other sources of resistance to a criminology of the state continue to impede the development of this field of inquiry.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The first decade of the 21 st century is an especially appropriate time and venue for addressing the state of the criminology of crimes of the state. The interrelationship of a criminology of crimes of the state with cognate areas of criminological inquiry is delineated. Jeffrey Ian Ross&s; book, The Dynamics of Political Crime (2003), surveyed the state of a criminology of crimes of the state, with attention to oppositional political crimes, state crimes, political corruption, illegal domestic surveillance, human rights violations, state violence, and state-corporate crime. Most criminologists involved with the study of crimes of the state have principally been associated with some strain of conflict, radical, or critical criminology. Beyond the disputes fixated on standards used, and definitional issues of crimes of the state, other sources of resistance to a criminology of the state continue to impede the development of this field of inquiry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The first decade of the 21 st century is an especially appropriate time and venue for addressing the state of the criminology of crimes of the state. The interrelationship of a criminology of crimes of the state with cognate areas of criminological inquiry is delineated. Jeffrey Ian Ross&s; book, The Dynamics of Political Crime (2003), surveyed the state of a criminology of crimes of the state, with attention to oppositional political crimes, state crimes, political corruption, illegal domestic surveillance, human rights violations, state violence, and state-corporate crime. Most criminologists involved with the study of crimes of the state have principally been associated with some strain of conflict, radical, or critical criminology. Beyond the disputes fixated on standards used, and definitional issues of crimes of the state, other sources of resistance to a criminology of the state continue to impede the development of this field of inquiry.

Key concepts: Criminology, State (computer science), Green criminology, Sociology, Political science, Criminal justice, Computer science, Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The State of the Criminology of Crimes of the State — Research Paper | ScholarLens