2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Norms, Harms and Disorder at the Border: The Legitimacy of Criminal Law Intervention through the Lens of Criminalisation Theory

Nina Peršak

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

State criminal law interventions must have good, valid normative reasons behind them in order to be legitimate. In the area of criminal law and criminal law philosophy, which has been a driving force behind the developments in the normative criminalisation theory, the notion of legitimacy has to do with the internal reasonableness and normative justification for criminalisation (understood in the broadest sense). What interests criminalisation theory, in other words, is what sort of human conduct, and for what reasons or under which conditions, it is legitimate to criminalise (and consequently punish) within a certain normative (legal, social, political, moral) orientation of a given society. This conception of legitimacy is therefore linked to the normative grounds for criminalisation and to the content of criminal law norms, and it is this notion of legitimacy that will be used in this chapter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

State criminal law interventions must have good, valid normative reasons behind them in order to be legitimate. In the area of criminal law and criminal law philosophy, which has been a driving force behind the developments in the normative criminalisation theory, the notion of legitimacy has to do with the internal reasonableness and normative justification for criminalisation (understood in the broadest sense). What interests criminalisation theory, in other words, is what sort of human conduct, and for what reasons or under which conditions, it is legitimate to criminalise (and consequently punish) within a certain normative (legal, social, political, moral) orientation of a given society. This conception of legitimacy is therefore linked to the normative grounds for criminalisation and to the content of criminal law norms, and it is this notion of legitimacy that will be used in this chapter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

State criminal law interventions must have good, valid normative reasons behind them in order to be legitimate. In the area of criminal law and criminal law philosophy, which has been a driving force behind the developments in the normative criminalisation theory, the notion of legitimacy has to do with the internal reasonableness and normative justification for criminalisation (understood in the broadest sense). What interests criminalisation theory, in other words, is what sort of human conduct, and for what reasons or under which conditions, it is legitimate to criminalise (and consequently punish) within a certain normative (legal, social, political, moral) orientation of a given society. This conception of legitimacy is therefore linked to the normative grounds for criminalisation and to the content of criminal law norms, and it is this notion of legitimacy that will be used in this chapter.

Key concepts: Legitimacy, Criminal law, Intervention (counseling), Criminology, Law, Through-the-lens metering, Political science, Lens (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Norms, Harms and Disorder at the Border: The Legitimacy of Criminal Law Intervention through the Lens of Criminalisation Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens