2017•New England Journal of MedicineOpen access

Variations in Databases Used to Assess Academic Output and Citation Impact

Natalie M. Plana, Jonathan P. Massie, Jonathan M. Bekisz, Stuart Spore, Jesus Rodrigo Diaz-Siso, Roberto L. Flores

Open full text 24 citations

Abstract

An analysis of listings of 1469 clinical and research faculty in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar showed major differences in numbers of publications and citations and in the h-index (a measure of productivity and citations) for each author.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An analysis of listings of 1469 clinical and research faculty in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar showed major differences in numbers of publications and citations and in the h-index (a measure of productivity and citations) for each author.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An analysis of listings of 1469 clinical and research faculty in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar showed major differences in numbers of publications and citations and in the h-index (a measure of productivity and citations) for each author.

Key concepts: Scopus, Medicine, Citation, Web of science, Impact factor, Bibliometrics, Citation analysis, Citation impact

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Variations in Databases Used to Assess Academic Output and Citation Impact — Research Paper | ScholarLens