Variations in Databases Used to Assess Academic Output and Citation Impact
Natalie M. Plana, Jonathan P. Massie, Jonathan M. Bekisz, Stuart Spore, Jesus Rodrigo Diaz-Siso, Roberto L. Flores
Abstract
Open-access reader
Natalie M. Plana, Jonathan P. Massie, Jonathan M. Bekisz, Stuart Spore, Jesus Rodrigo Diaz-Siso, Roberto L. Flores
Abstract
Open-access reader
An analysis of listings of 1469 clinical and research faculty in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar showed major differences in numbers of publications and citations and in the h-index (a measure of productivity and citations) for each author.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An analysis of listings of 1469 clinical and research faculty in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar showed major differences in numbers of publications and citations and in the h-index (a measure of productivity and citations) for each author.
Key concepts: Scopus, Medicine, Citation, Web of science, Impact factor, Bibliometrics, Citation analysis, Citation impact