2018ANNALI SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE - CLASSE DI SCIENZEOpen access

Isogenies of abelian Anderson A-modules and A-motives

Urs Hartl

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

As a generalization of Drinfeld modules, Greg Anderson introduced abelian t-modules and t-motives over a perfect field. In this article we study relative versions of these over rings. We investigate isogenies among them. Our main results state that every isogeny possesses a dual isogeny in the opposite direction, and that a morphism between abelian t-modules is an isogeny if and only if the corresponding morphism between their associated t-motives is an isogeny. We also study torsion submodules of abelian t-modules which in general are non-reduced group schemes. They can be obtained from the associated t-motive via the finite shtuka correspondence of Drinfeld and Abrashkin. The inductive limits of torsion submodules are the function field analogs of p-divisible groups. These limits correspond to the local shtukas attached to the t-motives associated with the abelian t-modules. In this sense the theory of abelian t-modules is captured by the theory of t-motives.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a generalization of Drinfeld modules, Greg Anderson introduced abelian t-modules and t-motives over a perfect field. In this article we study relative versions of these over rings. We investigate isogenies among them. Our main results state that every isogeny possesses a dual isogeny in the opposite direction, and that a morphism between abelian t-modules is an isogeny if and only if the corresponding morphism between their associated t-motives is an isogeny. We also study torsion submodules of abelian t-modules which in general are non-reduced group schemes. They can be obtained from the associated t-motive via the finite shtuka correspondence of Drinfeld and Abrashkin. The inductive limits of torsion submodules are the function field analogs of p-divisible groups. These limits correspond to the local shtukas attached to the t-motives associated with the abelian t-modules. In this sense the theory of abelian t-modules is captured by the theory of t-motives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a generalization of Drinfeld modules, Greg Anderson introduced abelian t-modules and t-motives over a perfect field. In this article we study relative versions of these over rings. We investigate isogenies among them. Our main results state that every isogeny possesses a dual isogeny in the opposite direction, and that a morphism between abelian t-modules is an isogeny if and only if the corresponding morphism between their associated t-motives is an isogeny. We also study torsion submodules of abelian t-modules which in general are non-reduced group schemes. They can be obtained from the associated t-motive via the finite shtuka correspondence of Drinfeld and Abrashkin. The inductive limits of torsion submodules are the function field analogs of p-divisible groups. These limits correspond to the local shtukas attached to the t-motives associated with the abelian t-modules. In this sense the theory of abelian t-modules is captured by the theory of t-motives.

Key concepts: Isogeny, Abelian group, Mathematics, Morphism, Pure mathematics, Torsion (gastropod), Generalization, Torsion subgroup

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Isogenies of abelian Anderson A-modules and A-motives — Research Paper | ScholarLens