1994Energy DailyRequires access

Yucca Mountain reviews a waste of time

D. Wamsted

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The author of this article contends that two proposed reviews of Yucca Mountain are a waste of time. Further reviews will not eliminate opposition. What is needed is real action on the issue, such as studying the safety and suitability of the proposed waste site.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author of this article contends that two proposed reviews of Yucca Mountain are a waste of time. Further reviews will not eliminate opposition. What is needed is real action on the issue, such as studying the safety and suitability of the proposed waste site.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author of this article contends that two proposed reviews of Yucca Mountain are a waste of time. Further reviews will not eliminate opposition. What is needed is real action on the issue, such as studying the safety and suitability of the proposed waste site.

Key concepts: Opposition (politics), Yucca, Radioactive waste, Waste management, Engineering, Civil engineering, Environmental science, Waste disposal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Yucca Mountain reviews a waste of time — Research Paper | ScholarLens