2002Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Requires access

Metonymy, Grammar and Communication

de Mendoza Ibá ntilde Ruiz, Francisco José ez, Otal Campo, Luis José

Open publisher page 131 citations

Abstract

In view of the needs of contemporary metonymy theory, the book has the following two main goals: 1 It attempts to characterise metonymy, i.e. to find a reliable set of criteria allowing us to distinguish metonymy from related semantic phenomena 2 The book considers the connections between metonymy and some grammatical phenomena, on the one hand, and between metonymy and so-called pragmatic inference, on the other hand. The book also addresses several other matters of importance within the current debate on metonymy such as its boundaries with literal uses of language, the problem of distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche, the interaction between metonymy and metaphor, and the complex issue of building a systematic taxonomy of metonymy types.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In view of the needs of contemporary metonymy theory, the book has the following two main goals: 1 It attempts to characterise metonymy, i.e. to find a reliable set of criteria allowing us to distinguish metonymy from related semantic phenomena 2 The book considers the connections between metonymy and some grammatical phenomena, on the one hand, and between metonymy and so-called pragmatic inference, on the other hand. The book also addresses several other matters of importance within the current debate on metonymy such as its boundaries with literal uses of language, the problem of distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche, the interaction between metonymy and metaphor, and the complex issue of building a systematic taxonomy of metonymy types.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 131 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In view of the needs of contemporary metonymy theory, the book has the following two main goals: 1 It attempts to characterise metonymy, i.e. to find a reliable set of criteria allowing us to distinguish metonymy from related semantic phenomena 2 The book considers the connections between metonymy and some grammatical phenomena, on the one hand, and between metonymy and so-called pragmatic inference, on the other hand. The book also addresses several other matters of importance within the current debate on metonymy such as its boundaries with literal uses of language, the problem of distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche, the interaction between metonymy and metaphor, and the complex issue of building a systematic taxonomy of metonymy types.

Key concepts: Metonymy, Linguistics, Synecdoche, Grammar, Metaphor, Computer science, Psychology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metonymy, Grammar and Communication — Research Paper | ScholarLens