2012SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Singapore's New Data Protection Authority: Strong Enforcement Powers and Business Risks

Graham Greenleaf

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Singapore’s Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) has quickly brought into effect on 2 January 2013 the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) enacted in October 2012. This article analyses the enforcement aspects of the Act. The data protection principles in the Act are analysed in http://ssrn.com/abstract=2212608.The structure and functions of the Personal Data Protection Commission are explained, and why it is not as an independent statutory authority. The article examined the various methods of dispute resolution at its disposal; avenues of appeal; the extent of transparency of the complaint and appeals processes and the advantages and disadvantages of this; and the remedies available, including through the courts as well as the Commission. The vicarious liability of employers for breaches and the personal liability on company officers for offences give non-compliance an unusual level of risk. The article concludes that although the standards for compliance with Singapore’s Act may not turn out to be very high, and it has exemptions of sweeping and partly unknown scope, that Act appears to have a serious and multi-faceted ‘enforcement pyramid.’ It is a data privacy law which may have surprising results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Singapore’s Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) has quickly brought into effect on 2 January 2013 the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) enacted in October 2012. This article analyses the enforcement aspects of the Act. The data protection principles in the Act are analysed in http://ssrn.com/abstract=2212608.The structure and functions of the Personal Data Protection Commission are explained, and why it is not as an independent statutory authority. The article examined the various methods of dispute resolution at its disposal; avenues of appeal; the extent of transparency of the complaint and appeals processes and the advantages and disadvantages of this; and the remedies available, including through the courts as well as the Commission. The vicarious liability of employers for breaches and the personal liability on company officers for offences give non-compliance an unusual level of risk. The article concludes that although the standards for compliance with Singapore’s Act may not turn out to be very high, and it has exemptions of sweeping and partly unknown scope, that Act appears to have a serious and multi-faceted ‘enforcement pyramid.’ It is a data privacy law which may have surprising results.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Singapore’s Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) has quickly brought into effect on 2 January 2013 the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) enacted in October 2012. This article analyses the enforcement aspects of the Act. The data protection principles in the Act are analysed in http://ssrn.com/abstract=2212608.The structure and functions of the Personal Data Protection Commission are explained, and why it is not as an independent statutory authority. The article examined the various methods of dispute resolution at its disposal; avenues of appeal; the extent of transparency of the complaint and appeals processes and the advantages and disadvantages of this; and the remedies available, including through the courts as well as the Commission. The vicarious liability of employers for breaches and the personal liability on company officers for offences give non-compliance an unusual level of risk. The article concludes that although the standards for compliance with Singapore’s Act may not turn out to be very high, and it has exemptions of sweeping and partly unknown scope, that Act appears to have a serious and multi-faceted ‘enforcement pyramid.’ It is a data privacy law which may have surprising results.

Key concepts: Enforcement, Business, Data Protection Act 1998, Commission, Appeal, Statutory law, Liability, Information privacy law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Singapore's New Data Protection Authority: Strong Enforcement Powers and Business Risks — Research Paper | ScholarLens