2006Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyOpen access

Intraoral and transcutaneous cervical ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses

Bernardo Cunha Araújo Filho, Flávio Akira Sakae, Luiz Ubirajara Sennes, Rui Imamura, Marcus R. de Menezes

Open full text 37 citations

Abstract

AIMS: The objective of the present study was to determine the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of intraoral and transcutaneous ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis and abscess. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical-Prospective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty nine patients were seen at the otorhinolaryngology emergency department of the University Hospital, of the School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, with a clinical diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis or abscess. After initial evaluation, all patients were submitted to intraoral and transcutaneous US. RESULTS: Intraoral US was performed on 35 cases and its sensitivity was of 95.2%, the specificity was of 78.5% and the accuracy was of 86.9%. Transcutaneous US was feasible in all 39 patients and diagnosed peritonsillar abscess in 53.8%. There were 5 false-negatives and 1 false-positive result, sensitivity was 80%, specificity was 92.8% and accuracy was 84.5%. CONCLUSION: Intraoral US was quite sensitive in the diagnosis of peritonsillar abscesses when performed by an experienced radiologist. Specificity was higher for transcutaneous US compared to intraoral US. However, when transcutaneous US was performed in patients with trismus, it was able to diagnose all peritonsillar abscesses, since they were large collections which are common in patients with trismus. These exams showed similar accuracy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIMS: The objective of the present study was to determine the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of intraoral and transcutaneous ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis and abscess. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical-Prospective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty nine patients were seen at the otorhinolaryngology emergency department of the University Hospital, of the School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, with a clinical diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis or abscess. After initial evaluation, all patients were submitted to intraoral and transcutaneous US. RESULTS: Intraoral US was performed on 35 cases and its sensitivity was of 95.2%, the specificity was of 78.5% and the accuracy was of 86.9%. Transcutaneous US was feasible in all 39 patients and diagnosed peritonsillar abscess in 53.8%. There were 5 false-negatives and 1 false-positive result, sensitivity was 80%, specificity was 92.8% and accuracy was 84.5%. CONCLUSION: Intraoral US was quite sensitive in the diagnosis of peritonsillar abscesses when performed by an experienced radiologist. Specificity was higher for transcutaneous US compared to intraoral US. However, when transcutaneous US was performed in patients with trismus, it was able to diagnose all peritonsillar abscesses, since they were large collections which are common in patients with trismus. These exams showed similar accuracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIMS: The objective of the present study was to determine the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of intraoral and transcutaneous ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis and abscess. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical-Prospective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty nine patients were seen at the otorhinolaryngology emergency department of the University Hospital, of the School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, with a clinical diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis or abscess. After initial evaluation, all patients were submitted to intraoral and transcutaneous US. RESULTS: Intraoral US was performed on 35 cases and its sensitivity was of 95.2%, the specificity was of 78.5% and the accuracy was of 86.9%. Transcutaneous US was feasible in all 39 patients and diagnosed peritonsillar abscess in 53.8%. There were 5 false-negatives and 1 false-positive result, sensitivity was 80%, specificity was 92.8% and accuracy was 84.5%. CONCLUSION: Intraoral US was quite sensitive in the diagnosis of peritonsillar abscesses when performed by an experienced radiologist. Specificity was higher for transcutaneous US compared to intraoral US. However, when transcutaneous US was performed in patients with trismus, it was able to diagnose all peritonsillar abscesses, since they were large collections which are common in patients with trismus. These exams showed similar accuracy.

Key concepts: Peritonsillar Abscess, Medicine, Cellulitis, Differential diagnosis, Radiology, Ultrasound, Abscess, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intraoral and transcutaneous cervical ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses — Research Paper | ScholarLens