Legal Research versus Legal Writing within the Law School Curriculum
Roy M. Mersky
Abstract
Roy M. Mersky
Abstract
The National Conference of Bar Examiners has proposed the development of a stand-alone legal research component to the bar exam. This recognition of the importance of legal research skills highlights the need for increased attention to legal research instruction in law schools. Professor Mersky looks at the history of legal writing and legal research programs in law schools, notes the continued demand by practitioners and the judiciary for improved legal research skills among recent graduates, and suggests curricular and instructional changes within the academy to address both these ongoing concerns and the expectations of a new generation of students.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The National Conference of Bar Examiners has proposed the development of a stand-alone legal research component to the bar exam. This recognition of the importance of legal research skills highlights the need for increased attention to legal research instruction in law schools. Professor Mersky looks at the history of legal writing and legal research programs in law schools, notes the continued demand by practitioners and the judiciary for improved legal research skills among recent graduates, and suggests curricular and instructional changes within the academy to address both these ongoing concerns and the expectations of a new generation of students.
Key concepts: Legal research, Legal writing, Legal psychology, Curriculum, Law, Legal opinion, Empirical legal studies, Political science