2006Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyOpen access

Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.

Otávio Bejzman Piltcher, Marcelo Cassanta Antunes, Fernanda Monteiro, Cláudia Schweiger, Barry Schatkin

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1.5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1.5 cm (12.22+/-4.25 vs 11.78+/-4.65 p<0,05; 12.22+/-4.25 vs 10.78+/-5.98 p<0.001; 11.78+/-4.65 vs 10.78+/-5.98 p<0.05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0.7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analyzing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontal sinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aesthetic results.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1.5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1.5 cm (12.22+/-4.25 vs 11.78+/-4.65 p<0,05; 12.22+/-4.25 vs 10.78+/-5.98 p<0.001; 11.78+/-4.65 vs 10.78+/-5.98 p<0.05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0.7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analyzing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontal sinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aesthetic results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1.5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1.5 cm (12.22+/-4.25 vs 11.78+/-4.65 p<0,05; 12.22+/-4.25 vs 10.78+/-5.98 p<0.001; 11.78+/-4.65 vs 10.78+/-5.98 p<0.05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0.7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analyzing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontal sinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aesthetic results.

Key concepts: Frontal sinus, Trephine, Medicine, Sinus (botany), Anatomy, Nuclear medicine, Forehead, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens