2010•Lincoln (University of Nebraska)Open access

"Good English": Literacy and Institutional Systems at a Community Literacy Organization

Charise G Alexander

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis explores the impact of institutions and the systems and communities of which they are a part on literacy instruction, practices, and rhetoric at a community literacy organization in Lincoln, Nebraska. A majority of students served by this organization are adult English Language Learners, many of whom receive instruction from volunteer tutors. In this unique context, a number of factors affect literacy learning, particularly the perpetuation of conservative, hegemonic discourses about literacy by the organizations which fund literacy education programming at this site. The power dynamics at work in these granting organizations and in larger systems that control and govern literacy (including its definition(s), practices, and instructional methods) influence the ways in which literacy is appropriated in the literacy organization’s rhetoric. However, these dominant conceptions of literacy do not fully take into account the learning needs, style, and attitudes of the diverse, dynamic populations of adult English Language Learners in contemporary Lincoln. This thesis seeks to expose the gaps in current scholarship on adult basic education and English Language Learners that limit the potential for understanding adult ELLs learning in nonacademic contexts.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis explores the impact of institutions and the systems and communities of which they are a part on literacy instruction, practices, and rhetoric at a community literacy organization in Lincoln, Nebraska. A majority of students served by this organization are adult English Language Learners, many of whom receive instruction from volunteer tutors. In this unique context, a number of factors affect literacy learning, particularly the perpetuation of conservative, hegemonic discourses about literacy by the organizations which fund literacy education programming at this site. The power dynamics at work in these granting organizations and in larger systems that control and govern literacy (including its definition(s), practices, and instructional methods) influence the ways in which literacy is appropriated in the literacy organization’s rhetoric. However, these dominant conceptions of literacy do not fully take into account the learning needs, style, and attitudes of the diverse, dynamic populations of adult English Language Learners in contemporary Lincoln. This thesis seeks to expose the gaps in current scholarship on adult basic education and English Language Learners that limit the potential for understanding adult ELLs learning in nonacademic contexts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis explores the impact of institutions and the systems and communities of which they are a part on literacy instruction, practices, and rhetoric at a community literacy organization in Lincoln, Nebraska. A majority of students served by this organization are adult English Language Learners, many of whom receive instruction from volunteer tutors. In this unique context, a number of factors affect literacy learning, particularly the perpetuation of conservative, hegemonic discourses about literacy by the organizations which fund literacy education programming at this site. The power dynamics at work in these granting organizations and in larger systems that control and govern literacy (including its definition(s), practices, and instructional methods) influence the ways in which literacy is appropriated in the literacy organization’s rhetoric. However, these dominant conceptions of literacy do not fully take into account the learning needs, style, and attitudes of the diverse, dynamic populations of adult English Language Learners in contemporary Lincoln. This thesis seeks to expose the gaps in current scholarship on adult basic education and English Language Learners that limit the potential for understanding adult ELLs learning in nonacademic contexts.

Key concepts: Literacy, Critical literacy, Rhetoric, Scholarship, Pedagogy, Context (archaeology), Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
"Good English": Literacy and Institutional Systems at a Community Literacy Organization — Research Paper | ScholarLens