Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
Hafeeza Naz, Kinza Mushtaq, Bilal Azeem Butt, Khadija Irfan Khawaja
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hafeeza Naz, Kinza Mushtaq, Bilal Azeem Butt, Khadija Irfan Khawaja
Abstract
Open-access reader
OBJECTIVE: To compare three different body fats estimation equations using skin fold measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: Sep. 2016. The triceps, biceps, subscapular, chest, thigh, abdominal, suprailiac skinfold thickness of the subjects was measured with skin-fold calipers (Harpenden) on non-dominant side. The percentage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skin-fold-thickness equations namely Durnin & Womersley, Jackson & Pollock and Sloan was compared with %FM measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA). RESULTS: . The mean %FM calculated by Durnin & Womersley (32.408±0.584), Jackson & Pollock (24.658±0.527), Sloan (20.40±0.545). The %FM by BIA was 38.182±0.529. All three equations showed positive correlation but underestimated %FM as compared to BIA. CONCLUSION: All three BF estimation equations underestimate body fat percentage compared to BIA. Among the three, Durnin & Womersley equation shows best positive correlation and hence it can be used for estimation of percentage fat mass as an alternate to BIA.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare three different body fats estimation equations using skin fold measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: Sep. 2016. The triceps, biceps, subscapular, chest, thigh, abdominal, suprailiac skinfold thickness of the subjects was measured with skin-fold calipers (Harpenden) on non-dominant side. The percentage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skin-fold-thickness equations namely Durnin & Womersley, Jackson & Pollock and Sloan was compared with %FM measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA). RESULTS: . The mean %FM calculated by Durnin & Womersley (32.408±0.584), Jackson & Pollock (24.658±0.527), Sloan (20.40±0.545). The %FM by BIA was 38.182±0.529. All three equations showed positive correlation but underestimated %FM as compared to BIA. CONCLUSION: All three BF estimation equations underestimate body fat percentage compared to BIA. Among the three, Durnin & Womersley equation shows best positive correlation and hence it can be used for estimation of percentage fat mass as an alternate to BIA.
Key concepts: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Medicine, Calipers, Skinfold thickness, Fat mass, Limits of agreement, Nuclear medicine, Animal science