2004The Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonRequires access

High-dose hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 in cabg surgery: Impact on blood loss and transfusions

Paschalis Tossios, S. M. Kasper, P Meinert, UM Fischer, M S�dkamp, Catherine Diefenbach, ER de Vivie, Uwe Mehlhorn

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Volume replacement using hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 impairs blood coagulation less than HES 200/0.5. We hypothesized that HES 130/0.4 may be used at higher doses without increasing the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. Methods: We randomized 120 patients scheduled for elective CABG to receive either up to 50ml/kg of 6% HES 130/0.4 or up to 33ml/kg of 6% HES 200/0.5 for volume replacement during surgery and until 24h thereafter. The first 33ml/kg of HES in both groups were administered in a double blind fashion. Volume requirements in excess of the respective maximum dose of HES were covered with gelatin. Colloid use was at the discretion of the attending physicians and not dictated by protocol. Results: The median volumes of HES administered were 49ml/kg and 33ml/kg in the HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 groups, respectively (p<0.001). Consequently, patients in the HES 130/0.4 group required less gelatin in addition to HES than those in the HES 200/0.5 group (7 vs. 20ml/kg [medians]; p<0.001). The combined volumes of HES and gelatin were similar for both groups (p=0.21). The 24-h chest tube drainage as well as erythrocyte transfusions were similar for both groups. Ten HES 130/0.4 patients and 19 HES 200/0.5 patients received a median of 2 FFP units (p=0.054). Conclusions: High-dose 6% HES 130/0.4 at a median dose of 49ml/kg did neither increase blood loss nor transfusions compared with 6% HES 200/0.5 at the manufacturer's recommended dose of 33ml/kg.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: Volume replacement using hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 impairs blood coagulation less than HES 200/0.5. We hypothesized that HES 130/0.4 may be used at higher doses without increasing the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. Methods: We randomized 120 patients scheduled for elective CABG to receive either up to 50ml/kg of 6% HES 130/0.4 or up to 33ml/kg of 6% HES 200/0.5 for volume replacement during surgery and until 24h thereafter. The first 33ml/kg of HES in both groups were administered in a double blind fashion. Volume requirements in excess of the respective maximum dose of HES were covered with gelatin. Colloid use was at the discretion of the attending physicians and not dictated by protocol. Results: The median volumes of HES administered were 49ml/kg and 33ml/kg in the HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 groups, respectively (p<0.001). Consequently, patients in the HES 130/0.4 group required less gelatin in addition to HES than those in the HES 200/0.5 group (7 vs. 20ml/kg [medians]; p<0.001). The combined volumes of HES and gelatin were similar for both groups (p=0.21). The 24-h chest tube drainage as well as erythrocyte transfusions were similar for both groups. Ten HES 130/0.4 patients and 19 HES 200/0.5 patients received a median of 2 FFP units (p=0.054). Conclusions: High-dose 6% HES 130/0.4 at a median dose of 49ml/kg did neither increase blood loss nor transfusions compared with 6% HES 200/0.5 at the manufacturer's recommended dose of 33ml/kg.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: Volume replacement using hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 impairs blood coagulation less than HES 200/0.5. We hypothesized that HES 130/0.4 may be used at higher doses without increasing the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. Methods: We randomized 120 patients scheduled for elective CABG to receive either up to 50ml/kg of 6% HES 130/0.4 or up to 33ml/kg of 6% HES 200/0.5 for volume replacement during surgery and until 24h thereafter. The first 33ml/kg of HES in both groups were administered in a double blind fashion. Volume requirements in excess of the respective maximum dose of HES were covered with gelatin. Colloid use was at the discretion of the attending physicians and not dictated by protocol. Results: The median volumes of HES administered were 49ml/kg and 33ml/kg in the HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 groups, respectively (p<0.001). Consequently, patients in the HES 130/0.4 group required less gelatin in addition to HES than those in the HES 200/0.5 group (7 vs. 20ml/kg [medians]; p<0.001). The combined volumes of HES and gelatin were similar for both groups (p=0.21). The 24-h chest tube drainage as well as erythrocyte transfusions were similar for both groups. Ten HES 130/0.4 patients and 19 HES 200/0.5 patients received a median of 2 FFP units (p=0.054). Conclusions: High-dose 6% HES 130/0.4 at a median dose of 49ml/kg did neither increase blood loss nor transfusions compared with 6% HES 200/0.5 at the manufacturer's recommended dose of 33ml/kg.

Key concepts: Hydroxyethyl starch, Perioperative, Medicine, Hetastarch, Anesthesia, Blood product, Coagulation, Blood transfusion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High-dose hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 in cabg surgery: Impact on blood loss and transfusions — Research Paper | ScholarLens