2020heiDOK (Heidelberg University)Open access

Beiträge zur Geschichte der Dritten Zwischenzeit

Karl Jansen-Winkeln

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In this short Beitrage three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty II , who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone I . The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon II .2. According to stela Cairo JE 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq I had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read ḥtp “offering,” not ẖntj “statue” or qnyt “portable image” as proposed before.3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakon.”

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this short Beitrage three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty II , who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone I . The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon II .2. According to stela Cairo JE 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq I had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read ḥtp “offering,” not ẖntj “statue” or qnyt “portable image” as proposed before.3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakon.”

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this short Beitrage three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty II , who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone I . The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon II .2. According to stela Cairo JE 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq I had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read ḥtp “offering,” not ẖntj “statue” or qnyt “portable image” as proposed before.3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakon.”

Key concepts: Statue, Art, Politics, Ancient history, Art history, History, Law, Political science

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beiträge zur Geschichte der Dritten Zwischenzeit — Research Paper | ScholarLens