1993Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)Open access

Level of Available Forage and Supplemental Protein and Energy for Cows Grazing Winter Range

R. J. Pruitt, M. C. Namminga, ROBIN HAIGH, Deborah Young

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

A winter grazing trial at the SDSU Range and Livestock Research Station near Cottonwood was conducted to determine if the response to feeding a high starch supplement is dependent on the amount of protein fed and the amount of forage available. During December and January 126 Simmental-Angus crossbred cows grazing two pastures with differing amounts of available forage were fed four supplemental treatments that provided the following amounts of crude protein (Ib) and metabolizable energy (Mcal) per cow daily: 1) .72 and 3.92, 2) .72 and 10.64, 3) 1.44 and 7.78, and 4) 1.44 and 10.91. Cows grazing the high available forage pasture gained 41 Ib more than those grazing the low forage pasture. lncreasing the amount of supplemental protein from .72 to 1.44 1b per cow daily increased cow gains. lncreasing the amount of supplemental energy did not improve cow weight gains when the level of supplemental protein was .72 1b per cow daily. When the amount of protein was doubled, increasing the amount of supplemental energy increased gains by 21 Ib. There was a tendency for a greater response to the higher protein, higher energy supplement for cows grazing the pasture with less forage available.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A winter grazing trial at the SDSU Range and Livestock Research Station near Cottonwood was conducted to determine if the response to feeding a high starch supplement is dependent on the amount of protein fed and the amount of forage available. During December and January 126 Simmental-Angus crossbred cows grazing two pastures with differing amounts of available forage were fed four supplemental treatments that provided the following amounts of crude protein (Ib) and metabolizable energy (Mcal) per cow daily: 1) .72 and 3.92, 2) .72 and 10.64, 3) 1.44 and 7.78, and 4) 1.44 and 10.91. Cows grazing the high available forage pasture gained 41 Ib more than those grazing the low forage pasture. lncreasing the amount of supplemental protein from .72 to 1.44 1b per cow daily increased cow gains. lncreasing the amount of supplemental energy did not improve cow weight gains when the level of supplemental protein was .72 1b per cow daily. When the amount of protein was doubled, increasing the amount of supplemental energy increased gains by 21 Ib. There was a tendency for a greater response to the higher protein, higher energy supplement for cows grazing the pasture with less forage available.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A winter grazing trial at the SDSU Range and Livestock Research Station near Cottonwood was conducted to determine if the response to feeding a high starch supplement is dependent on the amount of protein fed and the amount of forage available. During December and January 126 Simmental-Angus crossbred cows grazing two pastures with differing amounts of available forage were fed four supplemental treatments that provided the following amounts of crude protein (Ib) and metabolizable energy (Mcal) per cow daily: 1) .72 and 3.92, 2) .72 and 10.64, 3) 1.44 and 7.78, and 4) 1.44 and 10.91. Cows grazing the high available forage pasture gained 41 Ib more than those grazing the low forage pasture. lncreasing the amount of supplemental protein from .72 to 1.44 1b per cow daily increased cow gains. lncreasing the amount of supplemental energy did not improve cow weight gains when the level of supplemental protein was .72 1b per cow daily. When the amount of protein was doubled, increasing the amount of supplemental energy increased gains by 21 Ib. There was a tendency for a greater response to the higher protein, higher energy supplement for cows grazing the pasture with less forage available.

Key concepts: Grazing, Forage, Range (aeronautics), Environmental science, Agronomy, Animal science, Biology, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Level of Available Forage and Supplemental Protein and Energy for Cows Grazing Winter Range — Research Paper | ScholarLens