2010•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

How Parties Nominate Presidents

William G. Mayer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article reviews the evolution of the presidential nominating process and the role of party in securing presidential nominations from the founding to the modern era. It also describes the understanding of how voters reach decisions in presidential primaries and the larger consequences of the presidential nomination process for the functioning of the American political system. It starts by presenting a brief history of presidential nomination procedures. Two major ideas underlie most of the changes instituted by the McGovern-Fraser Commission. The most conspicuous consequence of the new rules was a significant increase in the number of presidential primaries. No matter what the rules, ambitious candidates and other actors find ways to make them work to their advantage or, at least, to neutralize the disadvantages. Party leaders have found ways of exerting influence in the post-reform nomination process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This article reviews the evolution of the presidential nominating process and the role of party in securing presidential nominations from the founding to the modern era. It also describes the understanding of how voters reach decisions in presidential primaries and the larger consequences of the presidential nomination process for the functioning of the American political system. It starts by presenting a brief history of presidential nomination procedures. Two major ideas underlie most of the changes instituted by the McGovern-Fraser Commission. The most conspicuous consequence of the new rules was a significant increase in the number of presidential primaries. No matter what the rules, ambitious candidates and other actors find ways to make them work to their advantage or, at least, to neutralize the disadvantages. Party leaders have found ways of exerting influence in the post-reform nomination process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This article reviews the evolution of the presidential nominating process and the role of party in securing presidential nominations from the founding to the modern era. It also describes the understanding of how voters reach decisions in presidential primaries and the larger consequences of the presidential nomination process for the functioning of the American political system. It starts by presenting a brief history of presidential nomination procedures. Two major ideas underlie most of the changes instituted by the McGovern-Fraser Commission. The most conspicuous consequence of the new rules was a significant increase in the number of presidential primaries. No matter what the rules, ambitious candidates and other actors find ways to make them work to their advantage or, at least, to neutralize the disadvantages. Party leaders have found ways of exerting influence in the post-reform nomination process.

Key concepts: Nomination, NOMINATE, Presidential system, Political science, Politics, Commission, Public administration, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Parties Nominate Presidents — Research Paper | ScholarLens