1997•Hong Kong Journal of OphthalmologyOpen access

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: Two years of follow-up

Patrick Pc Tong, TW Wong

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: To study the safety and efficacy of laser photorefractive keratectomy in different myopia groups. Materials and methods: 51 eyes of 30 patients underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a 193nm excimer laser to correct myopia. The eyes were divided into three groups: low, moderate, and high myopia. Results: Two years after PRK, 100% of the eyes in the low myopia group, 86.7% in the moderate myopia group, and 28.6% in the high myopia group achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In the low myopia group, 100% were within ±1 diopter (D) of emmetropia, as were 86.7% in the moderate group and 23.8% in the high myopia group. None of the eyes in the low myopia group, 13.3% in the moderate myopia group, and 57.1% in the high myopia group regressed more than 1D over the observation period. No significant complications were observed. Conclusion: Photorefractive keratectomy can be considered as an effective and safe procedure for correcting myopia in the low and moderate range.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To study the safety and efficacy of laser photorefractive keratectomy in different myopia groups. Materials and methods: 51 eyes of 30 patients underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a 193nm excimer laser to correct myopia. The eyes were divided into three groups: low, moderate, and high myopia. Results: Two years after PRK, 100% of the eyes in the low myopia group, 86.7% in the moderate myopia group, and 28.6% in the high myopia group achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In the low myopia group, 100% were within ±1 diopter (D) of emmetropia, as were 86.7% in the moderate group and 23.8% in the high myopia group. None of the eyes in the low myopia group, 13.3% in the moderate myopia group, and 57.1% in the high myopia group regressed more than 1D over the observation period. No significant complications were observed. Conclusion: Photorefractive keratectomy can be considered as an effective and safe procedure for correcting myopia in the low and moderate range.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To study the safety and efficacy of laser photorefractive keratectomy in different myopia groups. Materials and methods: 51 eyes of 30 patients underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a 193nm excimer laser to correct myopia. The eyes were divided into three groups: low, moderate, and high myopia. Results: Two years after PRK, 100% of the eyes in the low myopia group, 86.7% in the moderate myopia group, and 28.6% in the high myopia group achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In the low myopia group, 100% were within ±1 diopter (D) of emmetropia, as were 86.7% in the moderate group and 23.8% in the high myopia group. None of the eyes in the low myopia group, 13.3% in the moderate myopia group, and 57.1% in the high myopia group regressed more than 1D over the observation period. No significant complications were observed. Conclusion: Photorefractive keratectomy can be considered as an effective and safe procedure for correcting myopia in the low and moderate range.

Key concepts: Photorefractive keratectomy, Emmetropia, Medicine, Dioptre, Ophthalmology, Excimer laser, Refractive error, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: Two years of follow-up — Research Paper | ScholarLens