2017Civil and environmental researchRequires access

Mitigating Climate Change Through the Use of Cement Combinations in Concrete Construction

Samuel Olufemi Folagbade

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Supplementary cementitious materials are by-products with lower embodied carbon-dioxide (eCO 2 ) contents than Portland cement. But while supplementary cementitious materials could be used to mitigate climate change, their intrinsic hydraulicity and delayed hydration reactions could have negative effect on concrete performance and cost.  Hence, using 17 binary and ternary cement combinations containing fly ash, silica fume and metakaolin at the water/cement ratios of 0.35, 0.50 and 0.65, this paper investigated the effect of supplementary cementitious materials on the strength development, environmental impact and cost of concrete. The results confirmed that cement combination concretes have lower eCO 2 contents than Portland cement concrete. At equal strengths, binary cement concretes with fly ash up to 55% content and silica fume and metakaolin at not more than 5% contents were cheaper than Portland cement concrete. Also, ternary cement concretes with not more than 5% silica fume or metakaolin content at a total replacement level of not more than 35% were cheaper than Portland cement concrete. At equal strengths of 40, 50 and 60 N/mm 2 , results showed that the use of supplementary cementitious materials resulted in a reduction of 5.5-39.0% in eCO 2 content with 50-61.5% of the cement combination concretes being cheaper by 0.1-5.1% than Portland cement concrete. Hence, the use of cement combination in the right proportion would mitigate climate change without having adverse effect on the strength and cost of concrete. Keywords: blended cement, cement additions, compressive strength, embodied carbon-dioxide, supplementary cements

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Supplementary cementitious materials are by-products with lower embodied carbon-dioxide (eCO 2 ) contents than Portland cement. But while supplementary cementitious materials could be used to mitigate climate change, their intrinsic hydraulicity and delayed hydration reactions could have negative effect on concrete performance and cost.  Hence, using 17 binary and ternary cement combinations containing fly ash, silica fume and metakaolin at the water/cement ratios of 0.35, 0.50 and 0.65, this paper investigated the effect of supplementary cementitious materials on the strength development, environmental impact and cost of concrete. The results confirmed that cement combination concretes have lower eCO 2 contents than Portland cement concrete. At equal strengths, binary cement concretes with fly ash up to 55% content and silica fume and metakaolin at not more than 5% contents were cheaper than Portland cement concrete. Also, ternary cement concretes with not more than 5% silica fume or metakaolin content at a total replacement level of not more than 35% were cheaper than Portland cement concrete. At equal strengths of 40, 50 and 60 N/mm 2 , results showed that the use of supplementary cementitious materials resulted in a reduction of 5.5-39.0% in eCO 2 content with 50-61.5% of the cement combination concretes being cheaper by 0.1-5.1% than Portland cement concrete. Hence, the use of cement combination in the right proportion would mitigate climate change without having adverse effect on the strength and cost of concrete. Keywords: blended cement, cement additions, compressive strength, embodied carbon-dioxide, supplementary cements

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Supplementary cementitious materials are by-products with lower embodied carbon-dioxide (eCO 2 ) contents than Portland cement. But while supplementary cementitious materials could be used to mitigate climate change, their intrinsic hydraulicity and delayed hydration reactions could have negative effect on concrete performance and cost.  Hence, using 17 binary and ternary cement combinations containing fly ash, silica fume and metakaolin at the water/cement ratios of 0.35, 0.50 and 0.65, this paper investigated the effect of supplementary cementitious materials on the strength development, environmental impact and cost of concrete. The results confirmed that cement combination concretes have lower eCO 2 contents than Portland cement concrete. At equal strengths, binary cement concretes with fly ash up to 55% content and silica fume and metakaolin at not more than 5% contents were cheaper than Portland cement concrete. Also, ternary cement concretes with not more than 5% silica fume or metakaolin content at a total replacement level of not more than 35% were cheaper than Portland cement concrete. At equal strengths of 40, 50 and 60 N/mm 2 , results showed that the use of supplementary cementitious materials resulted in a reduction of 5.5-39.0% in eCO 2 content with 50-61.5% of the cement combination concretes being cheaper by 0.1-5.1% than Portland cement concrete. Hence, the use of cement combination in the right proportion would mitigate climate change without having adverse effect on the strength and cost of concrete. Keywords: blended cement, cement additions, compressive strength, embodied carbon-dioxide, supplementary cements

Key concepts: Metakaolin, Portland cement, Silica fume, Cementitious, Cement, Fly ash, Materials science, Compressive strength

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mitigating Climate Change Through the Use of Cement Combinations in Concrete Construction — Research Paper | ScholarLens