2017•OtolaryngologyRequires access

Is Pepsin a Reliable Marker of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux? A Systematic Review

Christian Calvo‐Henríquez, Alberto Ruano‐Raviña, Pedro Vaamonde, Gabriel Martínez‐Capoccioni, Carlos Martín‐Martín

Open publisher page 107 citations

Abstract

Objective Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common illness of otolaryngology visits. Over the past few years, pepsin has become a promising marker of LPR. The objective of the present research is to analyze the existing literature using pepsin as a diagnostic tool of LPR through a systematic review. Data Sources PubMed (Medline), Trip Database, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SUMsearch, and Web of Science. Review Methods The outcome assessed was the presence of pepsin in LPR patients. We included articles in which pepsin was studied in LPR patients (clinically suspected or with confirmed diagnosis). Studies with no control group, comparison group, and/or a sample size lower than 20 patients were excluded. Results Twelve studies were included. All included studies, with the exception of 2, found statistically significant differences for pepsin in cases compared with healthy controls. Conclusion Pepsin might be a reliable marker in LPR patients, although questions remain about optimal timing, location, nature, and threshold values for pepsin testing. Future investigations are necessary to clarify the best method to use pepsin in the diagnostic process of LPR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common illness of otolaryngology visits. Over the past few years, pepsin has become a promising marker of LPR. The objective of the present research is to analyze the existing literature using pepsin as a diagnostic tool of LPR through a systematic review. Data Sources PubMed (Medline), Trip Database, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SUMsearch, and Web of Science. Review Methods The outcome assessed was the presence of pepsin in LPR patients. We included articles in which pepsin was studied in LPR patients (clinically suspected or with confirmed diagnosis). Studies with no control group, comparison group, and/or a sample size lower than 20 patients were excluded. Results Twelve studies were included. All included studies, with the exception of 2, found statistically significant differences for pepsin in cases compared with healthy controls. Conclusion Pepsin might be a reliable marker in LPR patients, although questions remain about optimal timing, location, nature, and threshold values for pepsin testing. Future investigations are necessary to clarify the best method to use pepsin in the diagnostic process of LPR.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 107 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common illness of otolaryngology visits. Over the past few years, pepsin has become a promising marker of LPR. The objective of the present research is to analyze the existing literature using pepsin as a diagnostic tool of LPR through a systematic review. Data Sources PubMed (Medline), Trip Database, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SUMsearch, and Web of Science. Review Methods The outcome assessed was the presence of pepsin in LPR patients. We included articles in which pepsin was studied in LPR patients (clinically suspected or with confirmed diagnosis). Studies with no control group, comparison group, and/or a sample size lower than 20 patients were excluded. Results Twelve studies were included. All included studies, with the exception of 2, found statistically significant differences for pepsin in cases compared with healthy controls. Conclusion Pepsin might be a reliable marker in LPR patients, although questions remain about optimal timing, location, nature, and threshold values for pepsin testing. Future investigations are necessary to clarify the best method to use pepsin in the diagnostic process of LPR.

Key concepts: Pepsin, Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Medicine, Cochrane Library, Internal medicine, Systematic review, Gastroenterology, MEDLINE

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Pepsin a Reliable Marker of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux? A Systematic Review — Research Paper | ScholarLens