Educating for Innovation: Finding Balance in the Army's Professional Military Education System
De León, Noelle Paul
Abstract
De León, Noelle Paul
Abstract
Abstract : The Army Operating Concept describes the challenges of future warfare as volatile, complex, and uncertain. It goes on to state that winning in such an environment will require innovative, adaptive leaders and cohesive teams who thrive in complex and uncertain environments. In order to meet those challenges, the institutional Army must develop in leaders the appropriate skill sets. However, the professional military education (PME) system that the Army operates under is largely outdated and based on industrial age models. The arrival of the Army University signals a commitment to confronting the flaws in the Army's PME, but it does little to address the balance between training and education. This study then fills that gap by closely examining the current state of the Army's education system, the attributes needed in officers to meet today's challenges, education's role in developing those attributes, and the future of the Army's education system. By doing so, it aims to recommend a set of feasible changes that the Army can make to adjust the balance between education and training in the Army's PME. It then analyzes those solutions through the lens of various stakeholders to determine their validity.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract : The Army Operating Concept describes the challenges of future warfare as volatile, complex, and uncertain. It goes on to state that winning in such an environment will require innovative, adaptive leaders and cohesive teams who thrive in complex and uncertain environments. In order to meet those challenges, the institutional Army must develop in leaders the appropriate skill sets. However, the professional military education (PME) system that the Army operates under is largely outdated and based on industrial age models. The arrival of the Army University signals a commitment to confronting the flaws in the Army's PME, but it does little to address the balance between training and education. This study then fills that gap by closely examining the current state of the Army's education system, the attributes needed in officers to meet today's challenges, education's role in developing those attributes, and the future of the Army's education system. By doing so, it aims to recommend a set of feasible changes that the Army can make to adjust the balance between education and training in the Army's PME. It then analyzes those solutions through the lens of various stakeholders to determine their validity.
Key concepts: Balance (ability), Public relations, State (computer science), Order (exchange), Engineering, Set (abstract data type), Professional development, Engineering management