2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Educating for Innovation: Finding Balance in the Army's Professional Military Education System

De León, Noelle Paul

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The Army Operating Concept describes the challenges of future warfare as volatile, complex, and uncertain. It goes on to state that winning in such an environment will require innovative, adaptive leaders and cohesive teams who thrive in complex and uncertain environments. In order to meet those challenges, the institutional Army must develop in leaders the appropriate skill sets. However, the professional military education (PME) system that the Army operates under is largely outdated and based on industrial age models. The arrival of the Army University signals a commitment to confronting the flaws in the Army's PME, but it does little to address the balance between training and education. This study then fills that gap by closely examining the current state of the Army's education system, the attributes needed in officers to meet today's challenges, education's role in developing those attributes, and the future of the Army's education system. By doing so, it aims to recommend a set of feasible changes that the Army can make to adjust the balance between education and training in the Army's PME. It then analyzes those solutions through the lens of various stakeholders to determine their validity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The Army Operating Concept describes the challenges of future warfare as volatile, complex, and uncertain. It goes on to state that winning in such an environment will require innovative, adaptive leaders and cohesive teams who thrive in complex and uncertain environments. In order to meet those challenges, the institutional Army must develop in leaders the appropriate skill sets. However, the professional military education (PME) system that the Army operates under is largely outdated and based on industrial age models. The arrival of the Army University signals a commitment to confronting the flaws in the Army's PME, but it does little to address the balance between training and education. This study then fills that gap by closely examining the current state of the Army's education system, the attributes needed in officers to meet today's challenges, education's role in developing those attributes, and the future of the Army's education system. By doing so, it aims to recommend a set of feasible changes that the Army can make to adjust the balance between education and training in the Army's PME. It then analyzes those solutions through the lens of various stakeholders to determine their validity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The Army Operating Concept describes the challenges of future warfare as volatile, complex, and uncertain. It goes on to state that winning in such an environment will require innovative, adaptive leaders and cohesive teams who thrive in complex and uncertain environments. In order to meet those challenges, the institutional Army must develop in leaders the appropriate skill sets. However, the professional military education (PME) system that the Army operates under is largely outdated and based on industrial age models. The arrival of the Army University signals a commitment to confronting the flaws in the Army's PME, but it does little to address the balance between training and education. This study then fills that gap by closely examining the current state of the Army's education system, the attributes needed in officers to meet today's challenges, education's role in developing those attributes, and the future of the Army's education system. By doing so, it aims to recommend a set of feasible changes that the Army can make to adjust the balance between education and training in the Army's PME. It then analyzes those solutions through the lens of various stakeholders to determine their validity.

Key concepts: Balance (ability), Public relations, State (computer science), Order (exchange), Engineering, Set (abstract data type), Professional development, Engineering management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Educating for Innovation: Finding Balance in the Army's Professional Military Education System — Research Paper | ScholarLens