2017SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Can CSR-based Self-regulation be a Substitute for Legal Regulation? Conclusions from Public Goods Experiments

Rainer Maurer

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This article discusses various arguments, which question the effectiveness of self-regulation as an instrument to implement societally preferred environmental and social standards. Special focus is set on experimental results. These results indicate that it is not plausible that effective self-regulation in areas such as environmental protection or social standards is actually feasible under market conditions. The experimental evidence is much more in favor with the traditional approach that environmental or social standards should be implemented by general laws under the surveillance of an executive state body.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article discusses various arguments, which question the effectiveness of self-regulation as an instrument to implement societally preferred environmental and social standards. Special focus is set on experimental results. These results indicate that it is not plausible that effective self-regulation in areas such as environmental protection or social standards is actually feasible under market conditions. The experimental evidence is much more in favor with the traditional approach that environmental or social standards should be implemented by general laws under the surveillance of an executive state body.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article discusses various arguments, which question the effectiveness of self-regulation as an instrument to implement societally preferred environmental and social standards. Special focus is set on experimental results. These results indicate that it is not plausible that effective self-regulation in areas such as environmental protection or social standards is actually feasible under market conditions. The experimental evidence is much more in favor with the traditional approach that environmental or social standards should be implemented by general laws under the surveillance of an executive state body.

Key concepts: Profit (economics), Business, Value (mathematics), Control (management), Public economics, Corporate social responsibility, Economics, Industrial organization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can CSR-based Self-regulation be a Substitute for Legal Regulation? Conclusions from Public Goods Experiments — Research Paper | ScholarLens