Can CSR-based Self-regulation be a Substitute for Legal Regulation? Conclusions from Public Goods Experiments
Rainer Maurer
Abstract
Rainer Maurer
Abstract
This article discusses various arguments, which question the effectiveness of self-regulation as an instrument to implement societally preferred environmental and social standards. Special focus is set on experimental results. These results indicate that it is not plausible that effective self-regulation in areas such as environmental protection or social standards is actually feasible under market conditions. The experimental evidence is much more in favor with the traditional approach that environmental or social standards should be implemented by general laws under the surveillance of an executive state body.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article discusses various arguments, which question the effectiveness of self-regulation as an instrument to implement societally preferred environmental and social standards. Special focus is set on experimental results. These results indicate that it is not plausible that effective self-regulation in areas such as environmental protection or social standards is actually feasible under market conditions. The experimental evidence is much more in favor with the traditional approach that environmental or social standards should be implemented by general laws under the surveillance of an executive state body.
Key concepts: Profit (economics), Business, Value (mathematics), Control (management), Public economics, Corporate social responsibility, Economics, Industrial organization