ScholarLens Back to search
2017•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

No Need to Consider All Potential Uses of a Mark in Opposition Proceedings: Canadian Federal Court of Appeal

Emir Crowne

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal ruled in Domaines Pinnacle Inc. v. Constellation Brands Inc., 2016 FCA 302 that the Trademarks Opposition Board does not need to consider every potential and unidentified use of a mark during opposition proceedings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal ruled in Domaines Pinnacle Inc. v. Constellation Brands Inc., 2016 FCA 302 that the Trademarks Opposition Board does not need to consider every potential and unidentified use of a mark during opposition proceedings.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal ruled in Domaines Pinnacle Inc. v. Constellation Brands Inc., 2016 FCA 302 that the Trademarks Opposition Board does not need to consider every potential and unidentified use of a mark during opposition proceedings.

Key concepts: Opposition (politics), Appeal, Political science, Law, Federal court, Politics, Supreme court

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
No Need to Consider All Potential Uses of a Mark in Opposition Proceedings: Canadian Federal Court of Appeal — Research Paper | ScholarLens