Efficacy and safety of SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy for large bile duct stones
Fujing Lyu, Shutian Zhang, Ming Ji, Yongjun Wang, Peng Li, Qiaozhi Zhou
Abstract
Fujing Lyu, Shutian Zhang, Ming Ji, Yongjun Wang, Peng Li, Qiaozhi Zhou
Abstract
Objective To explore the value of SpyGlass (direct visualization system) guided laser lithotripsy for large bile duct stones in ERCP. Methods Thirty-three patients with large bile duct stones were randomly assigned to two groups: SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy group (n=16) and mechanical lithotripsy group (n=17). All patients underwent ERCP procedures for stones extraction. The success rate of complete stone removal, the early complication rate related to the procedure and procedure time were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of complete stone removal in SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy group was higher than that of the mechanical lithotripsy group. There were no significant differences between two groups in either procedure time or the early complication rate related to the procedure (18.8% VS 5.9%, P>0.05). Conclusion SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy is safe and effective for large bile duct stones. Key words: Common bile duct stones; Laser lithotripsy; SpyGlass system; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To explore the value of SpyGlass (direct visualization system) guided laser lithotripsy for large bile duct stones in ERCP. Methods Thirty-three patients with large bile duct stones were randomly assigned to two groups: SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy group (n=16) and mechanical lithotripsy group (n=17). All patients underwent ERCP procedures for stones extraction. The success rate of complete stone removal, the early complication rate related to the procedure and procedure time were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of complete stone removal in SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy group was higher than that of the mechanical lithotripsy group. There were no significant differences between two groups in either procedure time or the early complication rate related to the procedure (18.8% VS 5.9%, P>0.05). Conclusion SpyGlass guided laser lithotripsy is safe and effective for large bile duct stones. Key words: Common bile duct stones; Laser lithotripsy; SpyGlass system; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Key concepts: Laser lithotripsy, Lithotripsy, Medicine, Bile duct, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Complication, Common bile duct, Surgery