How a Court Becomes Supreme
Richard K Albert
Abstract
Richard K Albert
Abstract
High courts around the world have increasingly invalidated constitutional amendments in defense of their view of democracy, answering in the affirmative what was once a paradoxical question with no obvious answer: can a constitutional amendment be unconstitutional? In the United States, however, the Supreme Court has yet to articulate a theory or doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment. Faced with a constitutional amendment that would challenge the liberal democratic values of American constitutionalism — for instance an amendment to restrict political speech or to establish a national religion in the United States — the Court would be left without a strategy or vocabulary to protect the foundations of constitutional democracy in the United States. In this Article prepared for the annual “Constitutional Law Schmooze” at the University of Maryland, I sketch eight strategies the Court could deploy in order to defend of American constitutional democracy — and to make itself truly supreme by immunizing its judgments from reversal by constitutional amendment.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
High courts around the world have increasingly invalidated constitutional amendments in defense of their view of democracy, answering in the affirmative what was once a paradoxical question with no obvious answer: can a constitutional amendment be unconstitutional? In the United States, however, the Supreme Court has yet to articulate a theory or doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment. Faced with a constitutional amendment that would challenge the liberal democratic values of American constitutionalism — for instance an amendment to restrict political speech or to establish a national religion in the United States — the Court would be left without a strategy or vocabulary to protect the foundations of constitutional democracy in the United States. In this Article prepared for the annual “Constitutional Law Schmooze” at the University of Maryland, I sketch eight strategies the Court could deploy in order to defend of American constitutional democracy — and to make itself truly supreme by immunizing its judgments from reversal by constitutional amendment.
Key concepts: Supreme court, Constitutionalism, Law, Political science, Constitutional amendment, Constitutional law, Democracy, Liberal democracy