2015Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European NeurosurgeryRequires access

Surgical Options for Different Types of Craniosynostosis

Almir Džurlić, Ibrahim Omerhodžić, Alija Čeljo, Nermina Iblizović, Maida Nikšić, Bilal Imširović, Bekir Rovčanin, Azra Kadić, Vildana Huskić

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Craniosynostosis is defined as the premature closure of a cranial suture which causes abnormal calvarial growth. Skull growth is arrested in the direction perpendicular to the fused suture and expanded at the sites of unaffected sutures, leading to characteristic calvarial deformations. Material and Methods Ten patients with craniosynostosis were treated in our clinic between November 2011 and November 2014. Nine of them were with nonsyndromic and one of them was with syndromic craniosynostosis. Of these patients 8 (80%) were boys and 2 (20%) were girls. The patient's age at the time of surgical treatment ranged between 4 and 8 months. Depending on the shape of the head 6 patients were with scaphocephaly, 2 patients with anterior plagiocephaly 1, one patient with trigonocephaly and 1 patient with oxicephaly. Results All patients are well. There were no significant complications. We have achieved satisfying shape of the head in all cases. In a few cases was required blood transfusion. Conclusion Careful preoperative planning must include a discussion of which bones are to be removed, whether or not the supraorbital rim requires reconstruction, and if decompression of neural structures is required. If the operation is on the metopic or the coronal sutures, the exposure will need to be based anteriorly. If the operation is on the sagittal suture or the lambdoidal suture, the exposure will need to be based more posteriorly, although at times the frontal region may also require reconstruction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Craniosynostosis is defined as the premature closure of a cranial suture which causes abnormal calvarial growth. Skull growth is arrested in the direction perpendicular to the fused suture and expanded at the sites of unaffected sutures, leading to characteristic calvarial deformations. Material and Methods Ten patients with craniosynostosis were treated in our clinic between November 2011 and November 2014. Nine of them were with nonsyndromic and one of them was with syndromic craniosynostosis. Of these patients 8 (80%) were boys and 2 (20%) were girls. The patient's age at the time of surgical treatment ranged between 4 and 8 months. Depending on the shape of the head 6 patients were with scaphocephaly, 2 patients with anterior plagiocephaly 1, one patient with trigonocephaly and 1 patient with oxicephaly. Results All patients are well. There were no significant complications. We have achieved satisfying shape of the head in all cases. In a few cases was required blood transfusion. Conclusion Careful preoperative planning must include a discussion of which bones are to be removed, whether or not the supraorbital rim requires reconstruction, and if decompression of neural structures is required. If the operation is on the metopic or the coronal sutures, the exposure will need to be based anteriorly. If the operation is on the sagittal suture or the lambdoidal suture, the exposure will need to be based more posteriorly, although at times the frontal region may also require reconstruction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Craniosynostosis is defined as the premature closure of a cranial suture which causes abnormal calvarial growth. Skull growth is arrested in the direction perpendicular to the fused suture and expanded at the sites of unaffected sutures, leading to characteristic calvarial deformations. Material and Methods Ten patients with craniosynostosis were treated in our clinic between November 2011 and November 2014. Nine of them were with nonsyndromic and one of them was with syndromic craniosynostosis. Of these patients 8 (80%) were boys and 2 (20%) were girls. The patient's age at the time of surgical treatment ranged between 4 and 8 months. Depending on the shape of the head 6 patients were with scaphocephaly, 2 patients with anterior plagiocephaly 1, one patient with trigonocephaly and 1 patient with oxicephaly. Results All patients are well. There were no significant complications. We have achieved satisfying shape of the head in all cases. In a few cases was required blood transfusion. Conclusion Careful preoperative planning must include a discussion of which bones are to be removed, whether or not the supraorbital rim requires reconstruction, and if decompression of neural structures is required. If the operation is on the metopic or the coronal sutures, the exposure will need to be based anteriorly. If the operation is on the sagittal suture or the lambdoidal suture, the exposure will need to be based more posteriorly, although at times the frontal region may also require reconstruction.

Key concepts: Craniosynostosis, Skull, Fibrous joint, Sagittal suture, Medicine, Closure (psychology), Anatomy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surgical Options for Different Types of Craniosynostosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens