ScholarLens Back to search
2013•Padua Research Archive (University of Padova)Requires access

A prospective trial for the evaluation of esophageal cancer patients: fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) vs contrast enhancement (c.e.) CT vs. FDG PET/c.e.CT

Anna Rita Cervino, Lorraine S. Evangelista, Fabio Pomerri, Elena Scagliori, Rita Alfieri, Carlo Castoro, A. Ruol, Sara Galuppo, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, Giorgio Saladini

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Positron emission tomography, Esophageal cancer, Radiology, Tomography, Computed tomography, Fluorodeoxyglucose

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A prospective trial for the evaluation of esophageal cancer patients: fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) vs contrast enhancement (c.e.) CT vs. FDG PET/c.e.CT — Research Paper | ScholarLens