RCRA Compliance During Remediation of Waste Sites
Richard J. Hughto, Craig E. Blak
Abstract
Richard J. Hughto, Craig E. Blak
Abstract
The author discusses the impact of the proposed National Contingency Plan revisions of February 1985, which require that remedies under Superfund must attain or exceed applicable or relevant Federal public health and environmental standards, including those imposed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implications of CERCLA (the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) and RCRA, particularly as they apply to the development of remedial action programs at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author discusses the impact of the proposed National Contingency Plan revisions of February 1985, which require that remedies under Superfund must attain or exceed applicable or relevant Federal public health and environmental standards, including those imposed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implications of CERCLA (the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) and RCRA, particularly as they apply to the development of remedial action programs at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
Key concepts: Superfund, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Remedial action, Hazardous waste, Contingency plan, Liability, Environmental remediation, Environmental planning