Religion, rights and the public sphere
Volker Kaul
Abstract
Volker Kaul
Abstract
The article introduces to the issue of religion, rights and the public sphere. It analyzes 4 challenges that the conception of the public sphere currently faces: (1) Does there exists a trade-off between the public sphere and a legal regime of civil rights? (2) Does the public sphere really require us to keep the good and religious questions outside of it? (3) To what extent is the public sphere neutral and not rather itself the outcome of a particular and contingent conception of the good? (4) Whatever might be our answers to the questions 1 to 3, does not Islam constitute a special challenge for any conception of the public sphere? The article draws following prudent conclusions: First, rights are somewhat fundamental for a democratic public sphere. Second, a democratic public sphere cannot exclude religion. Third, little indicates that the public sphere is only a western concept. On the contrary, the public sphere has a universal character. Fourth, Islam does not pose any specific challenge to the public sphere, at least no more than the other religions.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article introduces to the issue of religion, rights and the public sphere. It analyzes 4 challenges that the conception of the public sphere currently faces: (1) Does there exists a trade-off between the public sphere and a legal regime of civil rights? (2) Does the public sphere really require us to keep the good and religious questions outside of it? (3) To what extent is the public sphere neutral and not rather itself the outcome of a particular and contingent conception of the good? (4) Whatever might be our answers to the questions 1 to 3, does not Islam constitute a special challenge for any conception of the public sphere? The article draws following prudent conclusions: First, rights are somewhat fundamental for a democratic public sphere. Second, a democratic public sphere cannot exclude religion. Third, little indicates that the public sphere is only a western concept. On the contrary, the public sphere has a universal character. Fourth, Islam does not pose any specific challenge to the public sphere, at least no more than the other religions.
Key concepts: Public sphere, Democracy, Private sphere, Islam, Public reason, Political science, Sociology, Law and economics