2017Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseRequires access

Electromyographic Analysis Of The Two Parts Of The Gluteus Maximus During Squat Exercises

Bhupinder Singh, Alex Bachtelle, Derek S. Camilleri, Melissa M. Lai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many lower extremity strengthening programs prescribed after injury include the squat as an integral part of rehabilitation. Little attention has been paid, however, in either research or clinical settings, to the impact of the functional differentiation on segmentation of the gluteus maximus (GM) muscle on the prescription of therapeutic exercise. The purpose of this study was to describe the activation of the two parts of the gluteus maximus muscle during a single and double leg squat. METHODS: Ten subjects (7 females, 3 males, mean age 23.6 years) without current neuromuscular or orthopedic ailments participated in the study. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was assessed with surface electrodes, (Model EMG-55, Therapeutics Unlimited). Electrodes were placed on the right side, lateral and inferior to PSIS for upper part of GM and inferior to the greater trochanter for the lower part of GM. EMG electrodes were also placed on the gluteus medius (GMED) and adductor magnus (ADM). Subjects performed 5 trials for each bilateral and single leg squats with a maximum knee flexion angle of 100 degrees. Squat activity was time normalized and EMG amplitudes normalized to %Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVIC). Paired t-test and pearson correlations (p-value <0.05) were performed between the levels of muscle activation for two types of squat. RESULTS: Mean activation was greater for the UGM (0.38 ± 0.04) compared to the LGM (0.25 ± 0.04) for the single leg squat (p < 0.01) demonstrating different recruitment. UGM activation was greater than LGM (p < 0.01) during abduction MVIC testing. A stronger correlation was observed between LGM-ADM (0.76) compared to UGM-ADM (0.55) for single leg squat. LGM was highly correlated to ADM during the bilateral squat (0.95). A strong correlation was also observed between UGM-GMED (0.74) during single leg squat. CONCLUSIONS: Differences are seen in the activation levels and patterns for the upper and lower GM. LGM compliments the role of ADM during both bilateral and single leg squats. Upper part of GM were strongly correlated with the GMED, suggesting the GM has an abductor function during a single leg squat.The results suggest that segmentation of muscles based on moment arms should be taken into consideration for muscle modeling and in developing more specific therapeutic exercises.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Many lower extremity strengthening programs prescribed after injury include the squat as an integral part of rehabilitation. Little attention has been paid, however, in either research or clinical settings, to the impact of the functional differentiation on segmentation of the gluteus maximus (GM) muscle on the prescription of therapeutic exercise. The purpose of this study was to describe the activation of the two parts of the gluteus maximus muscle during a single and double leg squat. METHODS: Ten subjects (7 females, 3 males, mean age 23.6 years) without current neuromuscular or orthopedic ailments participated in the study. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was assessed with surface electrodes, (Model EMG-55, Therapeutics Unlimited). Electrodes were placed on the right side, lateral and inferior to PSIS for upper part of GM and inferior to the greater trochanter for the lower part of GM. EMG electrodes were also placed on the gluteus medius (GMED) and adductor magnus (ADM). Subjects performed 5 trials for each bilateral and single leg squats with a maximum knee flexion angle of 100 degrees. Squat activity was time normalized and EMG amplitudes normalized to %Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVIC). Paired t-test and pearson correlations (p-value <0.05) were performed between the levels of muscle activation for two types of squat. RESULTS: Mean activation was greater for the UGM (0.38 ± 0.04) compared to the LGM (0.25 ± 0.04) for the single leg squat (p < 0.01) demonstrating different recruitment. UGM activation was greater than LGM (p < 0.01) during abduction MVIC testing. A stronger correlation was observed between LGM-ADM (0.76) compared to UGM-ADM (0.55) for single leg squat. LGM was highly correlated to ADM during the bilateral squat (0.95). A strong correlation was also observed between UGM-GMED (0.74) during single leg squat. CONCLUSIONS: Differences are seen in the activation levels and patterns for the upper and lower GM. LGM compliments the role of ADM during both bilateral and single leg squats. Upper part of GM were strongly correlated with the GMED, suggesting the GM has an abductor function during a single leg squat.The results suggest that segmentation of muscles based on moment arms should be taken into consideration for muscle modeling and in developing more specific therapeutic exercises.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Many lower extremity strengthening programs prescribed after injury include the squat as an integral part of rehabilitation. Little attention has been paid, however, in either research or clinical settings, to the impact of the functional differentiation on segmentation of the gluteus maximus (GM) muscle on the prescription of therapeutic exercise. The purpose of this study was to describe the activation of the two parts of the gluteus maximus muscle during a single and double leg squat. METHODS: Ten subjects (7 females, 3 males, mean age 23.6 years) without current neuromuscular or orthopedic ailments participated in the study. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was assessed with surface electrodes, (Model EMG-55, Therapeutics Unlimited). Electrodes were placed on the right side, lateral and inferior to PSIS for upper part of GM and inferior to the greater trochanter for the lower part of GM. EMG electrodes were also placed on the gluteus medius (GMED) and adductor magnus (ADM). Subjects performed 5 trials for each bilateral and single leg squats with a maximum knee flexion angle of 100 degrees. Squat activity was time normalized and EMG amplitudes normalized to %Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVIC). Paired t-test and pearson correlations (p-value <0.05) were performed between the levels of muscle activation for two types of squat. RESULTS: Mean activation was greater for the UGM (0.38 ± 0.04) compared to the LGM (0.25 ± 0.04) for the single leg squat (p < 0.01) demonstrating different recruitment. UGM activation was greater than LGM (p < 0.01) during abduction MVIC testing. A stronger correlation was observed between LGM-ADM (0.76) compared to UGM-ADM (0.55) for single leg squat. LGM was highly correlated to ADM during the bilateral squat (0.95). A strong correlation was also observed between UGM-GMED (0.74) during single leg squat. CONCLUSIONS: Differences are seen in the activation levels and patterns for the upper and lower GM. LGM compliments the role of ADM during both bilateral and single leg squats. Upper part of GM were strongly correlated with the GMED, suggesting the GM has an abductor function during a single leg squat.The results suggest that segmentation of muscles based on moment arms should be taken into consideration for muscle modeling and in developing more specific therapeutic exercises.

Key concepts: Squat, Medius, Electromyography, Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vastus medialis, Squatting position, Gluteal muscles

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electromyographic Analysis Of The Two Parts Of The Gluteus Maximus During Squat Exercises — Research Paper | ScholarLens