2016Ike Skelton Combined Arms Research Library (CARL) Digital Library (US Army Combined Arms Center)Requires access

Civil Affairs History and Doctrine: From Military Government to Interagency Partner

Thomas R Geisinger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Army has always had an obligation to safeguard civilians on the battlefield, minimize human suffering, and maintain order in territory it occupies. In the early history of the Army this requirement was completely at the discretion of a field commander within the laws of war. Seeing the large-scale military-led reconstruction efforts required after both World Wars, the Army created a Civil Affairs (CA)/Military Government capability that, because of its low priority for peacetime training and readiness, has historically been unprepared to fulfill its duties, which naturally accompany modern warfare. These missions have gradually given way to a civilian-led methodology of development for which Army CA is not currently optimized. Through a series of doctrinal and historical evolutions, CA has evolved into a primarily interagency tool for achieving U.S. strategic goals in threatened states under U.S. diplomatic control.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Army has always had an obligation to safeguard civilians on the battlefield, minimize human suffering, and maintain order in territory it occupies. In the early history of the Army this requirement was completely at the discretion of a field commander within the laws of war. Seeing the large-scale military-led reconstruction efforts required after both World Wars, the Army created a Civil Affairs (CA)/Military Government capability that, because of its low priority for peacetime training and readiness, has historically been unprepared to fulfill its duties, which naturally accompany modern warfare. These missions have gradually given way to a civilian-led methodology of development for which Army CA is not currently optimized. Through a series of doctrinal and historical evolutions, CA has evolved into a primarily interagency tool for achieving U.S. strategic goals in threatened states under U.S. diplomatic control.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Army has always had an obligation to safeguard civilians on the battlefield, minimize human suffering, and maintain order in territory it occupies. In the early history of the Army this requirement was completely at the discretion of a field commander within the laws of war. Seeing the large-scale military-led reconstruction efforts required after both World Wars, the Army created a Civil Affairs (CA)/Military Government capability that, because of its low priority for peacetime training and readiness, has historically been unprepared to fulfill its duties, which naturally accompany modern warfare. These missions have gradually given way to a civilian-led methodology of development for which Army CA is not currently optimized. Through a series of doctrinal and historical evolutions, CA has evolved into a primarily interagency tool for achieving U.S. strategic goals in threatened states under U.S. diplomatic control.

Key concepts: Peacetime, Law, Civil affairs, Doctrine, Obligation, Government (linguistics), Military doctrine, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Civil Affairs History and Doctrine: From Military Government to Interagency Partner — Research Paper | ScholarLens