2013eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)Requires access

Leading the implementation of the Australian Curriculum: a case for research

Loan Dao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article makes a case for research to be conducted into how leaders at the local school level are implementing Australias first nationalcurriculum, the challenges and enablers they are encountering in leading this implementation, and the role of professional developmentin supporting such implementation. According to Gerrard et al. (2013), the Australian Curriculum represents a significant intervention ineducational practice and governance and thus provides a unique opportunity to research changing systems and school-level practicesinvolved with large-scale curriculum reform. While there has been research into large-scale educational reform in other areas (see,for example, Bishop & Mulford, 1999; Ford, 2012; McCormick & Ayres, 2009), presently there is limited research in this particular area ofcurriculum change. This is not surprising given the recency of this implementation since 2012 in most states and territories. Althoughliterature on national curricula of other countries may offer some insights into the leadership of implementing a national curriculum inAustralia, it is argued that the idiosyncrasies of the Australian context suggest local research is required. The findings of local research willcontribute to knowledge in the field of school leadership and curriculum change, with specific reference to national curriculum reforms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article makes a case for research to be conducted into how leaders at the local school level are implementing Australias first nationalcurriculum, the challenges and enablers they are encountering in leading this implementation, and the role of professional developmentin supporting such implementation. According to Gerrard et al. (2013), the Australian Curriculum represents a significant intervention ineducational practice and governance and thus provides a unique opportunity to research changing systems and school-level practicesinvolved with large-scale curriculum reform. While there has been research into large-scale educational reform in other areas (see,for example, Bishop & Mulford, 1999; Ford, 2012; McCormick & Ayres, 2009), presently there is limited research in this particular area ofcurriculum change. This is not surprising given the recency of this implementation since 2012 in most states and territories. Althoughliterature on national curricula of other countries may offer some insights into the leadership of implementing a national curriculum inAustralia, it is argued that the idiosyncrasies of the Australian context suggest local research is required. The findings of local research willcontribute to knowledge in the field of school leadership and curriculum change, with specific reference to national curriculum reforms.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article makes a case for research to be conducted into how leaders at the local school level are implementing Australias first nationalcurriculum, the challenges and enablers they are encountering in leading this implementation, and the role of professional developmentin supporting such implementation. According to Gerrard et al. (2013), the Australian Curriculum represents a significant intervention ineducational practice and governance and thus provides a unique opportunity to research changing systems and school-level practicesinvolved with large-scale curriculum reform. While there has been research into large-scale educational reform in other areas (see,for example, Bishop & Mulford, 1999; Ford, 2012; McCormick & Ayres, 2009), presently there is limited research in this particular area ofcurriculum change. This is not surprising given the recency of this implementation since 2012 in most states and territories. Althoughliterature on national curricula of other countries may offer some insights into the leadership of implementing a national curriculum inAustralia, it is argued that the idiosyncrasies of the Australian context suggest local research is required. The findings of local research willcontribute to knowledge in the field of school leadership and curriculum change, with specific reference to national curriculum reforms.

Key concepts: Curriculum, Context (archaeology), Curriculum theory, Political science, National curriculum, Corporate governance, Curriculum development, Curriculum mapping

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Leading the implementation of the Australian Curriculum: a case for research — Research Paper | ScholarLens