Usefulness of Conventional vs. Total Random Cued Cloze Tests as Measures of Reading Comprehension
John P. Helfeldt, William A. Henk
Abstract
John P. Helfeldt, William A. Henk
Abstract
For more than 3 decades the cloze procedure has been extensively investigated, frequently discussed at reading conferences, presented in reading methods courses, and written about in the professional literature. A review of the more than 600 publications related to cloze test investigations reveals that the overwhelming majority of studies adhere to the model originally advanced by Wilson Taylor (1953). This article will examine the usefulness of an alternative cloze test format that fur-
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For more than 3 decades the cloze procedure has been extensively investigated, frequently discussed at reading conferences, presented in reading methods courses, and written about in the professional literature. A review of the more than 600 publications related to cloze test investigations reveals that the overwhelming majority of studies adhere to the model originally advanced by Wilson Taylor (1953). This article will examine the usefulness of an alternative cloze test format that fur-
Key concepts: Reading comprehension, Reading (process), Psychology, Test (biology), Cloze test, Comprehension, Mathematics education, Linguistics