2017호텔경영학연구Requires access

시나리오별 수변 · 산악 개발 사업수익성 탐색

김혁수

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this study, the project of water reservoir watershed (Scenario 1), the development of waterside space around dam (scenario 2), the mountain tourism development project based on traditional Hanok, and the scenarios 1 and 2 are simultaneously implemented using hydrophilic scenery (Scenario 3). The analysis of Scenario 1 shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 105%, which is very good. The net present value (NPV) is about 120 billion won, which is considerable when considering the investment amount is approximately 150 billion KRW. Scenario 2 analysis shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 56.25%, which means that the capital cost (risk free rate) is 5-10%. The net present value (NPV) is approximately KRW 78.1 billion, which is considerable when considering the investment funds of KRW 200 billion. Scenario 3 analysis shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 67.40%, which is very good when considering 5 ~ 10% of capital cost (risk free rate). The net present value (NPV) is about KRW 268.9 billion, showing good profitability, considering the investment funds of KRW 500 billion. In conclusion, if the scenarios are separately performed or the scenario of the integration concept is carried out, the overall financial feasibility of the project seems to be very good.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, the project of water reservoir watershed (Scenario 1), the development of waterside space around dam (scenario 2), the mountain tourism development project based on traditional Hanok, and the scenarios 1 and 2 are simultaneously implemented using hydrophilic scenery (Scenario 3). The analysis of Scenario 1 shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 105%, which is very good. The net present value (NPV) is about 120 billion won, which is considerable when considering the investment amount is approximately 150 billion KRW. Scenario 2 analysis shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 56.25%, which means that the capital cost (risk free rate) is 5-10%. The net present value (NPV) is approximately KRW 78.1 billion, which is considerable when considering the investment funds of KRW 200 billion. Scenario 3 analysis shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 67.40%, which is very good when considering 5 ~ 10% of capital cost (risk free rate). The net present value (NPV) is about KRW 268.9 billion, showing good profitability, considering the investment funds of KRW 500 billion. In conclusion, if the scenarios are separately performed or the scenario of the integration concept is carried out, the overall financial feasibility of the project seems to be very good.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, the project of water reservoir watershed (Scenario 1), the development of waterside space around dam (scenario 2), the mountain tourism development project based on traditional Hanok, and the scenarios 1 and 2 are simultaneously implemented using hydrophilic scenery (Scenario 3). The analysis of Scenario 1 shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 105%, which is very good. The net present value (NPV) is about 120 billion won, which is considerable when considering the investment amount is approximately 150 billion KRW. Scenario 2 analysis shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 56.25%, which means that the capital cost (risk free rate) is 5-10%. The net present value (NPV) is approximately KRW 78.1 billion, which is considerable when considering the investment funds of KRW 200 billion. Scenario 3 analysis shows that the payback period (PP) is about 1.5 years and the internal rate of return (IRR) is 67.40%, which is very good when considering 5 ~ 10% of capital cost (risk free rate). The net present value (NPV) is about KRW 268.9 billion, showing good profitability, considering the investment funds of KRW 500 billion. In conclusion, if the scenarios are separately performed or the scenario of the integration concept is carried out, the overall financial feasibility of the project seems to be very good.

Key concepts: Internal rate of return, Payback period, Net present value, Profitability index, Investment (military), Present value, Rate of return, Economics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
시나리오별 수변 · 산악 개발 사업수익성 탐색 — Research Paper | ScholarLens