2013•Masaryk University Journal of Law and TechnologyOpen access

The Private Use of the Social Networks by the Civil Servants – a Possible “achilles’ Heel’’ of Personal Data Protection in Public Order and Security I

Alexandrina-Augusta Bora

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Public order and systems represent structures in which both protection of classified information and protection of personal data are strictly regulated by laws, internal regulations and concrete measures to protect computer communication networks. We conducted an empirical study by interviewing a group of 150 people belonging to the public order and institutions that shows that a significant percentage of them use social networks outside work program in private life. Based on the conclusions of the study and the empirical observations made on some of the public order and institutions staff we outline the need to analyze the possible risks to their professional activity deriving from insufficient protection of their personal data during the use of social networks. Furthermore, we argue that these risks are amplified in the case of police officers who have to do undercover work using in the same time the mobile Internet. Finally, we argue that this type of attitude endangers law enforcement and of the officers and it is influenced by two factors: the weakness of SNSs data protection regulations and the freedom of expression exercised carelessly by the public order and institutions staff. In order to find remedies for this vulnerability created by this security breach derived from the private activity of public order and institutions staff in social networks, we propose to continue the empirical study to find the reasons behind this type of behaviour and if they have reasonable expectations of privacy related to SNSs policies of data protection. Based on these findings we could be focused on developing an adequate training programme concerning this issue for police officers or the public order and institutions staff because they are professionals who might give a special attention to these issues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Public order and systems represent structures in which both protection of classified information and protection of personal data are strictly regulated by laws, internal regulations and concrete measures to protect computer communication networks. We conducted an empirical study by interviewing a group of 150 people belonging to the public order and institutions that shows that a significant percentage of them use social networks outside work program in private life. Based on the conclusions of the study and the empirical observations made on some of the public order and institutions staff we outline the need to analyze the possible risks to their professional activity deriving from insufficient protection of their personal data during the use of social networks. Furthermore, we argue that these risks are amplified in the case of police officers who have to do undercover work using in the same time the mobile Internet. Finally, we argue that this type of attitude endangers law enforcement and of the officers and it is influenced by two factors: the weakness of SNSs data protection regulations and the freedom of expression exercised carelessly by the public order and institutions staff. In order to find remedies for this vulnerability created by this security breach derived from the private activity of public order and institutions staff in social networks, we propose to continue the empirical study to find the reasons behind this type of behaviour and if they have reasonable expectations of privacy related to SNSs policies of data protection. Based on these findings we could be focused on developing an adequate training programme concerning this issue for police officers or the public order and institutions staff because they are professionals who might give a special attention to these issues.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Public order and systems represent structures in which both protection of classified information and protection of personal data are strictly regulated by laws, internal regulations and concrete measures to protect computer communication networks. We conducted an empirical study by interviewing a group of 150 people belonging to the public order and institutions that shows that a significant percentage of them use social networks outside work program in private life. Based on the conclusions of the study and the empirical observations made on some of the public order and institutions staff we outline the need to analyze the possible risks to their professional activity deriving from insufficient protection of their personal data during the use of social networks. Furthermore, we argue that these risks are amplified in the case of police officers who have to do undercover work using in the same time the mobile Internet. Finally, we argue that this type of attitude endangers law enforcement and of the officers and it is influenced by two factors: the weakness of SNSs data protection regulations and the freedom of expression exercised carelessly by the public order and institutions staff. In order to find remedies for this vulnerability created by this security breach derived from the private activity of public order and institutions staff in social networks, we propose to continue the empirical study to find the reasons behind this type of behaviour and if they have reasonable expectations of privacy related to SNSs policies of data protection. Based on these findings we could be focused on developing an adequate training programme concerning this issue for police officers or the public order and institutions staff because they are professionals who might give a special attention to these issues.

Key concepts: Order (exchange), Law enforcement, Data Protection Act 1998, Business, Enforcement, Work (physics), Personally identifiable information, Empirical research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Private Use of the Social Networks by the Civil Servants – a Possible “achilles’ Heel’’ of Personal Data Protection in Public Order and Security I — Research Paper | ScholarLens