2017THE BANGKOK MEDICAL JOURNALOpen access

Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders

Anupong Tangaroonsanti, Sith Siramolpiwat, Varocha Mahachai, Ratha‐Korn Vilaichone

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Esophageal manometry is an important tool for evaluating esophageal function. It can be used for assessing the esophageal peristaltic pattern and also peristaltic intensity. Additionally, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function can be studied simultaneously. This information allows clinicians to thoroughly investigate patients presenting with esophageal and/or respiratory symptoms without identifable structural cause. At present, high resolution manometry (HRM) is preferred over conventional manometry as it informs the result in pressure topography. These data correlate more precisely with the clinical presentation of patients with esophageal dysmotility. Consequently, the HRM working group has proposed the criteria known as Chicago classifcation to categorize and specify the esophageal motility abnormality based on the results from HRM. This article describes esophageal motility disorders according to the current diagnostic criteria and also how to manage them in brief.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Esophageal manometry is an important tool for evaluating esophageal function. It can be used for assessing the esophageal peristaltic pattern and also peristaltic intensity. Additionally, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function can be studied simultaneously. This information allows clinicians to thoroughly investigate patients presenting with esophageal and/or respiratory symptoms without identifable structural cause. At present, high resolution manometry (HRM) is preferred over conventional manometry as it informs the result in pressure topography. These data correlate more precisely with the clinical presentation of patients with esophageal dysmotility. Consequently, the HRM working group has proposed the criteria known as Chicago classifcation to categorize and specify the esophageal motility abnormality based on the results from HRM. This article describes esophageal motility disorders according to the current diagnostic criteria and also how to manage them in brief.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Esophageal manometry is an important tool for evaluating esophageal function. It can be used for assessing the esophageal peristaltic pattern and also peristaltic intensity. Additionally, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function can be studied simultaneously. This information allows clinicians to thoroughly investigate patients presenting with esophageal and/or respiratory symptoms without identifable structural cause. At present, high resolution manometry (HRM) is preferred over conventional manometry as it informs the result in pressure topography. These data correlate more precisely with the clinical presentation of patients with esophageal dysmotility. Consequently, the HRM working group has proposed the criteria known as Chicago classifcation to categorize and specify the esophageal motility abnormality based on the results from HRM. This article describes esophageal motility disorders according to the current diagnostic criteria and also how to manage them in brief.

Key concepts: High resolution manometry, Esophageal motility disorder, Medicine, Esophageal sphincter, Peristalsis, Internal medicine, Abnormality, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens