2020•Unpublished venueOpen access

Em At Ncsu.Pdf

Natalie S. Cherbaka, Jerome P. Lavelle

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper describes an analysis and proposal for starting an Engineering Management (EM) program in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University (NCSU).We first define EM in the context of current discussions within the discipline, and provide results of a benchmarking survey of existing programs.This sets a context for understanding the discipline and constraints on the design of a proposed program.From this we describe and evaluate potential proposals for an EM program at NCSU. Engineering Management TodayDefining Engineering Management: Engineering Management as a discipline is not tightly defined, as demonstrated by a relatively wide variance among academic EM programs.The discipline is often grouped with Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering, or Management of Technology.Although very few EM definitions exist, current discipline trends are represented by the following:  Engineering Management is the art and science of planning, organizing, allocating resources, and directing and controlling activities which have a technological component.2  Engineering Management is the bridge between the engineering and management disciplines.6  The engineering manager possesses both the ability to apply engineering principles and a skill in organizing and directing people and projects.3 EM programs are distinguished from systems engineering (SE) programs primarily by the management aspect.SE focuses on the development life-cycle from an operational and mathematical perspective with heavy emphasis on decision analysis, structured problem solving approaches, and the interaction/integration of systems.In contrast, an EM program focuses on managing SE efforts and engineering relationships with the rest of the organization.Along the spectrum of programs labeled as EM, those that rely heavily on industrial engineering (IE) tend to focus on management of a process within specific engineering disciplines, and, like SE, are concerned with operational decisions.This is in contrast to management of technology (MOT) programs that focus on traditional management techniques with application to technology assets, not engineering processes as with SE and IE.The opposite approach from SE is an MBA program that teaches pure management theory without application to any specific discipline.EM programs straddle the gap between these approaches, emphasizing the management of all engineering disciplines and overlapping slightly with IE and MOT. Figure 1, adapted from Kotnour and Farr 6 , presents a visual of this overlap.Page 14.526.2

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes an analysis and proposal for starting an Engineering Management (EM) program in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University (NCSU).We first define EM in the context of current discussions within the discipline, and provide results of a benchmarking survey of existing programs.This sets a context for understanding the discipline and constraints on the design of a proposed program.From this we describe and evaluate potential proposals for an EM program at NCSU. Engineering Management TodayDefining Engineering Management: Engineering Management as a discipline is not tightly defined, as demonstrated by a relatively wide variance among academic EM programs.The discipline is often grouped with Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering, or Management of Technology.Although very few EM definitions exist, current discipline trends are represented by the following:  Engineering Management is the art and science of planning, organizing, allocating resources, and directing and controlling activities which have a technological component.2  Engineering Management is the bridge between the engineering and management disciplines.6  The engineering manager possesses both the ability to apply engineering principles and a skill in organizing and directing people and projects.3 EM programs are distinguished from systems engineering (SE) programs primarily by the management aspect.SE focuses on the development life-cycle from an operational and mathematical perspective with heavy emphasis on decision analysis, structured problem solving approaches, and the interaction/integration of systems.In contrast, an EM program focuses on managing SE efforts and engineering relationships with the rest of the organization.Along the spectrum of programs labeled as EM, those that rely heavily on industrial engineering (IE) tend to focus on management of a process within specific engineering disciplines, and, like SE, are concerned with operational decisions.This is in contrast to management of technology (MOT) programs that focus on traditional management techniques with application to technology assets, not engineering processes as with SE and IE.The opposite approach from SE is an MBA program that teaches pure management theory without application to any specific discipline.EM programs straddle the gap between these approaches, emphasizing the management of all engineering disciplines and overlapping slightly with IE and MOT. Figure 1, adapted from Kotnour and Farr 6 , presents a visual of this overlap.Page 14.526.2

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes an analysis and proposal for starting an Engineering Management (EM) program in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University (NCSU).We first define EM in the context of current discussions within the discipline, and provide results of a benchmarking survey of existing programs.This sets a context for understanding the discipline and constraints on the design of a proposed program.From this we describe and evaluate potential proposals for an EM program at NCSU. Engineering Management TodayDefining Engineering Management: Engineering Management as a discipline is not tightly defined, as demonstrated by a relatively wide variance among academic EM programs.The discipline is often grouped with Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering, or Management of Technology.Although very few EM definitions exist, current discipline trends are represented by the following:  Engineering Management is the art and science of planning, organizing, allocating resources, and directing and controlling activities which have a technological component.2  Engineering Management is the bridge between the engineering and management disciplines.6  The engineering manager possesses both the ability to apply engineering principles and a skill in organizing and directing people and projects.3 EM programs are distinguished from systems engineering (SE) programs primarily by the management aspect.SE focuses on the development life-cycle from an operational and mathematical perspective with heavy emphasis on decision analysis, structured problem solving approaches, and the interaction/integration of systems.In contrast, an EM program focuses on managing SE efforts and engineering relationships with the rest of the organization.Along the spectrum of programs labeled as EM, those that rely heavily on industrial engineering (IE) tend to focus on management of a process within specific engineering disciplines, and, like SE, are concerned with operational decisions.This is in contrast to management of technology (MOT) programs that focus on traditional management techniques with application to technology assets, not engineering processes as with SE and IE.The opposite approach from SE is an MBA program that teaches pure management theory without application to any specific discipline.EM programs straddle the gap between these approaches, emphasizing the management of all engineering disciplines and overlapping slightly with IE and MOT. Figure 1, adapted from Kotnour and Farr 6 , presents a visual of this overlap.Page 14.526.2

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Em At Ncsu.Pdf — Research Paper | ScholarLens