The International Protection of Refugees and Asylum Seekers: the Role of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Colin Harvey
Abstract
Colin Harvey
Abstract
This chapter examines aspects of the relevance of Article 3 to the protection of refugees and asylum seekers. This human rights guarantee has evolved through interpretation to include cases of deportation and the foreseeable consequences of return. The suggestion in this chapter is that the general discussion of Article 3 can occasionally be misleading; it cannot credibly be argued that the Court has now opened the gates of Europe to the oppressed of the world or that it has been thoughtless or irresponsible in its approach. Yes, Article 3 is &s;absolute&s; in the sense that no textual limitations are there and no derogations are permitted. The Court has nevertheless carefully and intentionally delimited the scope of protection; successfully establishing a &s;real risk&s; is not straightforward, and the interpretative battles fought across Europe are evident in the recent jurisprudence of the Court.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter examines aspects of the relevance of Article 3 to the protection of refugees and asylum seekers. This human rights guarantee has evolved through interpretation to include cases of deportation and the foreseeable consequences of return. The suggestion in this chapter is that the general discussion of Article 3 can occasionally be misleading; it cannot credibly be argued that the Court has now opened the gates of Europe to the oppressed of the world or that it has been thoughtless or irresponsible in its approach. Yes, Article 3 is &s;absolute&s; in the sense that no textual limitations are there and no derogations are permitted. The Court has nevertheless carefully and intentionally delimited the scope of protection; successfully establishing a &s;real risk&s; is not straightforward, and the interpretative battles fought across Europe are evident in the recent jurisprudence of the Court.
Key concepts: Refugee, Convention, Human rights, Political science, Law, Criminology, Sociology