2016Unpublished venueRequires access

The International Protection of Refugees and Asylum Seekers: the Role of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Colin Harvey

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines aspects of the relevance of Article 3 to the protection of refugees and asylum seekers. This human rights guarantee has evolved through interpretation to include cases of deportation and the foreseeable consequences of return. The suggestion in this chapter is that the general discussion of Article 3 can occasionally be misleading; it cannot credibly be argued that the Court has now opened the gates of Europe to the oppressed of the world or that it has been thoughtless or irresponsible in its approach. Yes, Article 3 is &s;absolute&s; in the sense that no textual limitations are there and no derogations are permitted. The Court has nevertheless carefully and intentionally delimited the scope of protection; successfully establishing a &s;real risk&s; is not straightforward, and the interpretative battles fought across Europe are evident in the recent jurisprudence of the Court.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines aspects of the relevance of Article 3 to the protection of refugees and asylum seekers. This human rights guarantee has evolved through interpretation to include cases of deportation and the foreseeable consequences of return. The suggestion in this chapter is that the general discussion of Article 3 can occasionally be misleading; it cannot credibly be argued that the Court has now opened the gates of Europe to the oppressed of the world or that it has been thoughtless or irresponsible in its approach. Yes, Article 3 is &s;absolute&s; in the sense that no textual limitations are there and no derogations are permitted. The Court has nevertheless carefully and intentionally delimited the scope of protection; successfully establishing a &s;real risk&s; is not straightforward, and the interpretative battles fought across Europe are evident in the recent jurisprudence of the Court.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines aspects of the relevance of Article 3 to the protection of refugees and asylum seekers. This human rights guarantee has evolved through interpretation to include cases of deportation and the foreseeable consequences of return. The suggestion in this chapter is that the general discussion of Article 3 can occasionally be misleading; it cannot credibly be argued that the Court has now opened the gates of Europe to the oppressed of the world or that it has been thoughtless or irresponsible in its approach. Yes, Article 3 is &s;absolute&s; in the sense that no textual limitations are there and no derogations are permitted. The Court has nevertheless carefully and intentionally delimited the scope of protection; successfully establishing a &s;real risk&s; is not straightforward, and the interpretative battles fought across Europe are evident in the recent jurisprudence of the Court.

Key concepts: Refugee, Convention, Human rights, Political science, Law, Criminology, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The International Protection of Refugees and Asylum Seekers: the Role of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens