2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Allocative vs. Productive Spectrum Efficiency

Ben Freyens, Oleg Yerokhin

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Achieving efficient spectrum management in the pursuit of the public interest is a key aspect of deregulatory reforms in several OECD countries. However, these reforms have proved surprisingly ambiguous about the nature of the efficiencies to be achieved. Spectrum law requires new licensing regimes to promote both allocative and productive efficiency. But which should prevail when these objectives exclude each other in practice? A convenient consensus is to target allocative efficiency for larger standardized services, and productive efficiency for tailored specialist services. In this article we show that adopting this criterion can still lead to a stalemate. We then present a simple economic model to prove the primacy of allocative efficiency in situations of conflicting objectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Achieving efficient spectrum management in the pursuit of the public interest is a key aspect of deregulatory reforms in several OECD countries. However, these reforms have proved surprisingly ambiguous about the nature of the efficiencies to be achieved. Spectrum law requires new licensing regimes to promote both allocative and productive efficiency. But which should prevail when these objectives exclude each other in practice? A convenient consensus is to target allocative efficiency for larger standardized services, and productive efficiency for tailored specialist services. In this article we show that adopting this criterion can still lead to a stalemate. We then present a simple economic model to prove the primacy of allocative efficiency in situations of conflicting objectives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Achieving efficient spectrum management in the pursuit of the public interest is a key aspect of deregulatory reforms in several OECD countries. However, these reforms have proved surprisingly ambiguous about the nature of the efficiencies to be achieved. Spectrum law requires new licensing regimes to promote both allocative and productive efficiency. But which should prevail when these objectives exclude each other in practice? A convenient consensus is to target allocative efficiency for larger standardized services, and productive efficiency for tailored specialist services. In this article we show that adopting this criterion can still lead to a stalemate. We then present a simple economic model to prove the primacy of allocative efficiency in situations of conflicting objectives.

Key concepts: Allocative efficiency, Stalemate, Economics, Productive efficiency, Economic efficiency, Simple (philosophy), Microeconomics, Public economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Allocative vs. Productive Spectrum Efficiency — Research Paper | ScholarLens